Abstract:Responsibility is a moral quality of caring that is central to child health policies. In contemporary United Kingdom these policies are based on behavioural psychology and underpinned by individualism, an ideology central to neoliberal governance. Amid the complexities of "obesity" and inequalities, there is a multi-layered stigmatisation of parents as moral associates. Few studies consider the lived realities of food policy processes from the standpoint of class. This critical qualitative research draws on theorists who explain processes of power and class: Foucault, Gramsci, Bourdieu, and Marx. Its objectives are: (a) to understand the lived experience of parents as they interact with food policy; (b) to explore how parents resist stigmatisation; and (c) to reflect on implications for policy and practice. Methods: Using purposive sampling, 31 ethnographically informed interviews were carried out in a London borough, with policy actors: policymakers, implementers, and parents as policy recipients, including 12 working-class mothers. Results: A core theme of "responsibilities" emerged with four interconnecting sub-processes that provide insight into how stigmatisation and resistance evolve through policy. Discussion: As have others, this study reveals the idea of responsibility as fundamental to the processes of soft power. Child health is a priority for participants and a "ruling idea." The diffusion of responsibility throughout policy leads to confusion about where it lies. New subjectivities are formed in line with ideas of governmentality. Parents engage with policy at multiple sites that elicit symbolic violence, and stigma sows social divisions. Against this background, working-class parents are left in a state of cognitive dissonance between being made responsible (responsibilisation), and feeling responsible (self-blaming) for their children's weight while lacking the material resources to provide an optimal nutritious diet. Resistance is interwoven and is essentially found in parents' policy alternatives that diverge from United Kingdom government policy. Conclusion: Critical qualitative research using multiple theorists is valuable in understanding how parents interact with policy in a complex social world. With United Kingdom policy failing, useful insights are provided into how involving parents in policymaking might determine a meaningful collective responsibility, with a political ethic of care and unity between parents that would advance health equity.

Reconceptualising Judith Butler’s theory of ‘grievability’ in relation to the UK’s ‘war on obesity’: Personal responsibility, biopolitics and disposability

Social Implications of Weight Bias Internalisation: Parents' Ultimate Responsibility as Consent, Social Division and Resistance

Fat shaming under neoliberalism and COVID-19: Examining the UK's Tackling Obesity campaign

Duty of care trumps utilitarianism in multi-professional obesity management decisions

Multimodal strategies of emotional governance: a critical analysis of ‘nudge’ tactics in health policy

Dietary approaches to weight-loss, Health At Every Size® and beyond: rethinking the war on obesity

‘Lose weight, save the NHS’: Discourses of obesity in press coverage of COVID-19

Beyond individual responsibility: Exploring lay understandings of the contribution of environments on personal trajectories of obesity

[Obesity as structural injustice: towards a radically different social contract for a healthier society]

Paradoxical bodies: negotiating biomedical fix, responsibility, and care in a weight-loss surgery clinic

Cruel optimism, affective governmentality and frontline poverty governance: 'You can promise the world'

The personal is political: reframing individual acts of kindness as social solidarity in social work practice

Reframing the public/private debate on healthcare services: Tracking boundaries in the National Health Service

Why we struggle to make progress in obesity prevention and how we might overcome policy inertia: Lessons from the complexity and political sciences

The vices and virtues of medical models of obesity

[Obesity and intersectionality: critical analysis of narratives within public health policies in Brazil (2004-2021)]

The Anathattractive s/State: A Marxist-Semiotic Analysis of the Discourse, Ideology and Practice of Neoliberal Workfare

Manufacturing Responsibility: The Governmentality of Behavioural Power in Social Policies

Re-thinking Digital Health: Data, Appisation and the (im)possibility of ‘Opting out’

Foucault's progeny: Jamie Oliver and the art of governing obesity

Food, bodies, health (risks): the biopolitics of organic materiality testing in the context of diet-associated health risk management practices