Abstract:Responsibility is a moral quality of caring that is central to child health policies. In contemporary United Kingdom these policies are based on behavioural psychology and underpinned by individualism, an ideology central to neoliberal governance. Amid the complexities of "obesity" and inequalities, there is a multi-layered stigmatisation of parents as moral associates. Few studies consider the lived realities of food policy processes from the standpoint of class. This critical qualitative research draws on theorists who explain processes of power and class: Foucault, Gramsci, Bourdieu, and Marx. Its objectives are: (a) to understand the lived experience of parents as they interact with food policy; (b) to explore how parents resist stigmatisation; and (c) to reflect on implications for policy and practice. Methods: Using purposive sampling, 31 ethnographically informed interviews were carried out in a London borough, with policy actors: policymakers, implementers, and parents as policy recipients, including 12 working-class mothers. Results: A core theme of "responsibilities" emerged with four interconnecting sub-processes that provide insight into how stigmatisation and resistance evolve through policy. Discussion: As have others, this study reveals the idea of responsibility as fundamental to the processes of soft power. Child health is a priority for participants and a "ruling idea." The diffusion of responsibility throughout policy leads to confusion about where it lies. New subjectivities are formed in line with ideas of governmentality. Parents engage with policy at multiple sites that elicit symbolic violence, and stigma sows social divisions. Against this background, working-class parents are left in a state of cognitive dissonance between being made responsible (responsibilisation), and feeling responsible (self-blaming) for their children's weight while lacking the material resources to provide an optimal nutritious diet. Resistance is interwoven and is essentially found in parents' policy alternatives that diverge from United Kingdom government policy. Conclusion: Critical qualitative research using multiple theorists is valuable in understanding how parents interact with policy in a complex social world. With United Kingdom policy failing, useful insights are provided into how involving parents in policymaking might determine a meaningful collective responsibility, with a political ethic of care and unity between parents that would advance health equity.

Multimodal strategies of emotional governance: a critical analysis of ‘nudge’ tactics in health policy

Social Implications of Weight Bias Internalisation: Parents' Ultimate Responsibility as Consent, Social Division and Resistance

Costs, equity and acceptability of three policies to prevent obesity: A narrative review to support policy development

Unintended consequences in traffic-light food labeling: A call for mixed methods in public health research

Nudging in Public Health Lifestyle Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review and Metasynthesis

Media and the staging of policy controversy: obesity and the UK sugar tax

Social acceptability of standard and behavioral economic inspired policies designed to reduce and prevent obesity

Social class, anxieties and mothers' foodwork

Fat shaming under neoliberalism and COVID-19: Examining the UK's Tackling Obesity campaign

Generating political priority for regulatory interventions targeting obesity prevention: an Australian case study

Exploring the Viability and Acceptance of Nudge in Public Policies for Health Promotion

Factors Affecting Public Acceptance of Healthy Lifestyle Nudges

A critique of the English national policy from a social determinants of health perspective using a realist and problem representation approach: the 'Childhood Obesity: a plan for action' (2016, 2018, 2019)

Understanding the role of the state in dietary public health policymaking: a critical scoping review

Why we struggle to make progress in obesity prevention and how we might overcome policy inertia: Lessons from the complexity and political sciences

Reconceptualising Judith Butler’s theory of ‘grievability’ in relation to the UK’s ‘war on obesity’: Personal responsibility, biopolitics and disposability

Inhibitors and Supporters of Policy Change in the Regulation of Unhealthy Food Marketing in Australia

A Proposed Strategy against Obesity: How Government Policy Can Counter the Obesogenic Environment

The role of attention and health goals in nudging healthy food choice

Restricting the advertising of high fat, salt and sugar foods on the Transport for London estate: Process and implementation study

Influence government, platform power and the patchwork profile: Exploring the appropriation of targeted advertising infrastructures for government behaviour change campaigns