Experimental Study on Sandstone Rock Cutting with Chisel Picks
Ouyang Yiping,Chen Xinquan,Shanghai Jiao Tong University Underwater Engineering Institute Co. Ltd,Xu Yongfu,Qiu Yiping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02331-9
IF: 6.518
2021-01-01
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Abstract:Rock cutting with chisel picks has been applied in mining, tunnelling, and drilling for several decades. Over recent dec‐ ades, much effort has been made to investigate the mecha‐ nism of rock cutting with chisel picks and to propose esti‐ mation models for the cutting force. Evans’ model, which is based on tensile breakage theory (Evans 1962, 1965), and Nishimatsu’s model, which is based on shear breakage theory (Nishimatsu 1972), are the most famous models for rock cutting with a chisel pick. However, they usually under‐ estimate the cutting forces in rock cutting tests (Bilgin 1977; Goktan 1990; Ouyang 2013; Yasar and Yilmaz 2017a, b, 2018; Yilmaz et al. 2007) and cannot account for the effects of the skew and tilt angles. Numerical methods, including the finite element method (FEM) (Jaime et al. 2015; Men‐ ezes 2016, 2017a, b; Menezes et al. 2014; Samui et al. 2016; Su 2019) and discrete element method (DEM) (He and Xu 2015; Huang et al. 2013; Li et al. 2017; Yanxin et al. 2017), are becoming increasingly popular in addressing rock cutting problems. However, the initiation and propagation of cracks on rocks in the simulations still considerably deviate from the experimental results (Menezes 2016, 2017a, b; Menezes et al. 2014), and the cutting forces and rock fragments from rock cutting simulations with the DEM are quite different from the experimental results. Thus, the present theoretical methods and numerical methods are insufficient for practical application and need further improvement. To validate and improve the theoretical and numerical models for rock cutting, a great number of rock cutting tests with chisel picks have been performed in recent decades (Allington 1969; Bilgin 1977; Dogruoz et al. 2016; Moham‐ madi et al. 2020; Rostamsowlat 2018; Rostamsowlat et al. 2018a, b, 2019; Tiryaki and Dikmen 2006; Yadav et al. 2018; Yasar and Yilmaz 2017a, b). As the cutting force is the most important index in rock cutting, the effects of the cutting parameters on cutting forces are investigated in most of the works in the literature. For many rocks, the cutting force values for chisel picks in the cutting tests show lin‐ ear relationships with the cutting depth (Allington 1969; Bilgin 1977; Mohammadi et al. 2020; Rostamsowlat et al. 2018a, b; Yasar and Yilmaz 2017a, b). However, for some rocks, the cutting force increases in a parabolic form with increasing d, as presented in Allington (1969), Dagrain et al. (2001), Richard et al. (2010), especially when a small ratio of the cutting width to the cutting depth is adopted in the cutting tests. The cutting width is another important cutting parameter that has a great effect on the cutting force. The experimental results in Bilgin (1977) show that the cutting force has a linear relationship with the cutting width when rock cutting with a chisel pick. Additionally, the effect of the rake angle on rock cutting was studied in Bilgin (1977), Richard et al. (2010), Rostamsowlat et al. (2018b), Yadav et al. (2018). Basically, the cutting force increases with a decreasing rake angle (or an increasing back rake angle). Therefore, the rake angle is presumed to affect the friction angle during rock cutting (Rostamsowlat et al. 2018b). In general, many valuable results have been obtained by experiments. However, in most previous experimental stud‐ ies, the cutting depth is usually very small (less than a few millimetres), and the effects of the skew angle and tilt angle * Xinquan Chen chenxinquan@sjtu.edu.cn