More Information = Less Aggression? Impact of Information Asymmetry on Chinese Patients' Aggression

Yuepei Xu,Wen He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00118
IF: 5.2
2019-05-22
Frontiers in Public Health
Abstract:<span><strong>Background:</strong> Information asymmetry is a widely studied economic phenomenon. It refers to the situation in which one group in a transaction has more information than the other. Nowadays, information asymmetry has been studied not only as a financial topic but also as a potential reason for essential social problems.<strong>Objective:</strong> To take Chinese doctor–patient relationship as an example and investigate the relationship among information asymmetry, trust level, and aggression behavior using an experimental design.<strong>Methods:</strong> A total of 44 undergraduates (information asymmetry group, <i>N</i> = 22, 5 males, 17 females, mean age = 18.95, <i>SD</i> = 0.18; information symmetry group, <i>N</i> = 22, 7 males, 15 females, mean age = 19.27, <i>SD</i> = 0.18) took part in our experiment. Different slides and guidance were used to create a virtual information asymmetry situation, and we use the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale (WFPTS) and the hot sauce allocation paradigm to measure their trust level and aggression, respectively.<strong>Results:</strong> Participants in the information asymmetry group allocated significantly more hot sauce to the doctor (<i>p</i> d = 1.09) and displayed significantly lower trust level (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05, <i>d</i> = −0.78) than the control group. Patients' trust level had a significant mediating effect (95% confidence interval [−1.39, –0.05]).<strong>Conclusion:</strong> Asymmetric information may arouse patients' aggression and lower their trust in doctors. Patients' trust level is also a significant partial mediator between their aggression and information asymmetry. The current study reinforces the urgent need for information openness in the Chinese medical system.</span>
public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?