Abstract:We hypothesize that sample species abundance, sequencing depth, and taxonomic relatedness influence the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). To test this hypothesis, we assessed MAG recovery in three in silico microbial communities composed of 42 species with the same richness but different sample species abundance, sequencing depth, and taxonomic distribution profiles using three different pipelines for MAG recovery. The pipeline developed by Parks and colleagues (8K) generated the highest number of MAGs and the lowest number of true positives per community profile. The pipeline by Karst and colleagues (DT) showed the most accurate results (~ 92%), outperforming the 8K and Multi-Metagenome pipeline (MM) developed by Albertsen and collaborators. Sequencing depth influenced the accurate recovery of genomes when using the 8K and MM, even with contrasting patterns: the MM pipeline recovered more MAGs found in the original communities when employing sequencing depths up to 60 million reads, while the 8K recovered more true positives in communities sequenced above 60 million reads. DT showed the best species recovery from the same genus, even though close-related species have a low recovery rate in all pipelines. Our results highlight that more bins do not translate to the actual community composition and that sequencing depth plays a role in MAG recovery and increased community resolution. Even low MAG recovery error rates can significantly impact biological inferences. Our data indicates that the scientific community should curate their findings from MAG recovery, especially when asserting novel species or metabolic traits. Microbial communities are incredibly diverse and play essential roles in ecosystems, from recycling nutrients to influencing climate change. We explored how the microbial community assembly can influence its species' metagenomics recovery. Specifically, we examined how the abundance of different species within a sample, the extent of DNA sequencing (sequencing depth), and the species taxonomic relatedness affect our ability to accurately reconstruct these communities. We computationally simulated three microbial communities, each composed of 42 species. These communities varied in species abundance, sequencing depth, and how closely related the species were to each other. We then applied three different computational techniques to reconstruct the original communities from the simulated sequence data. Our findings highlight the critical impact of sequencing depth and taxonomical relatedness, specifically, on accurately recovering microbial genomes. Interestingly, more sequencing does not always equate to more accurate community representation. Moreover, even a few false positives can significantly distort our interpretations of microbial diversity and function. Our research underscores the importance of carefully considering these factors in metagenomic studies to avoid misleading conclusions about microbial ecosystems. Our work contributes to refining metagenomic techniques, aiming for a more reliable and nuanced understanding of microbial life's role in our planet's health and functioning.

Impact of Host DNA and Sequencing Depth on the Taxonomic Resolution of Whole Metagenome Sequencing for Microbiome Analysis

Metagenomic Sequencing for Microbial DNA in Human Samples: Emerging Technological Advances

Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for whole metagenome sequencing of human oral, vaginal, and rectal microbiome samples

The impact of sequencing depth on the inferred taxonomic composition and AMR gene content of metagenomic samples

High Sensitivity of Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing in Colon Tissue Biopsy by Host DNA Depletion

Host and Microbiome Multi-Omics Integration: Applications and Methodologies.

Taxonomic classification and abundance estimation using 16S and WGS-A comparison using controlled reference samples

Simulation of 69 microbial communities indicates sequencing depth and false positives are major drivers of bias in prokaryotic metagenome-assembled genome recovery

A metatranscriptomics strategy for efficient characterization of the microbiome in human tissues with low microbial biomass

Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis

Analysis of the microbiome: Advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing

Microbiome, Metagenomics, and High-Dimensional Compositional Data Analysis

16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform

Sequencing Depth Has a Stronger Effect than DNA Extraction on Soil Bacterial Richness Discovery

Evaluation of computational methods for human microbiome analysis using simulated data

Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses

Improved sampling and DNA extraction procedures for microbiome analysis in food-processing environments

Evaluation of metagenomic, 16S rRNA gene and ultra-plexed PCR-based sequencing approaches for profiling antimicrobial resistance gene and bacterial taxonomic composition of polymicrobial samples

Metagenomics versus total RNA sequencing: most accurate data-processing tools, microbial identification accuracy and perspectives for ecological assessments

Characterizing Microbiomes via Sequencing of Marker Loci: Techniques To Improve Throughput, Account for Cross-Contamination, and Reduce Cost