Abstract:Background Our understanding of the composition, function, and health implications of human microbiota has been advanced by high-throughput sequencing and the development of new genomic analyses. However, trade-offs among alternative strategies for the acquisition and analysis of sequence data remain understudied. Methods We assessed eight popular taxonomic profiling pipelines; MetaPhlAn2, metaMix, PathoScope 2.0, Sigma, Kraken, ConStrains, Centrifuge and Taxator-tk, against a battery of metagenomic datasets simulated from real data. The metagenomic datasets were modeled on 426 complete or permanent draft genomes stored in the Human Oral Microbiome Database and were designed to simulate various experimental conditions, both in the design of a putative experiment; read length (75–1,000 bp reads), sequence depth (100K–10M), and in metagenomic composition; number of species present (10, 100, 426), species distribution. The sensitivity and specificity of each of the pipelines under various scenarios were measured. We also estimated the relative root mean square error and average relative error to assess the abundance estimates produced by different methods. Additional datasets were generated for five of the pipelines to simulate the presence within a metagenome of an unreferenced species, closely related to other referenced species. Additional datasets were also generated in order to measure computational time on datasets of ever-increasing sequencing depth (up to 6 × 10 7 ). Results Testing of eight pipelines against 144 simulated metagenomic datasets initially produced 1,104 discrete results. Pipelines using a marker gene strategy; MetaPhlAn2 and ConStrains, were overall less sensitive, than other pipelines; with the notable exception of Taxator-tk. This difference in sensitivity was largely made up in terms of runtime, significantly lower than more sensitive pipelines that rely on whole-genome alignments such as PathoScope2.0. However, pipelines that used strategies to speed-up alignment between genomic references and metagenomic reads, such as kmerization, were able to combine both high sensitivity and low run time, as is the case with Kraken and Centrifuge. Absent species genomes in the database mostly led to assignment of reads to the most closely related species available in all pipelines. Our results therefore suggest that taxonomic profilers that use kmerization have largely superseded those that use gene markers, coupling low run times with high sensitivity and specificity. Taxonomic profilers using more time-consuming read reassignment, such as PathoScope 2.0, provided the most sensitive profiles under common metagenomic sequencing scenarios. All the results described and discussed in this paper can be visualized using the dedicated R Shiny application ( https://github.com/microgenomics/HumanMicrobiomeAnalysis ). All of our datasets, pipelines and results are made available through the GitHub repository for future benchmarking.

Taxonomic classification and abundance estimation using 16S and WGS-A comparison using controlled reference samples

Analysis of the microbiome: Advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing

Metagenomic profiling pipelines improve taxonomic classification for 16S amplicon sequencing data

Evaluation of computational methods for human microbiome analysis using simulated data

Comparing whole‐genome shotgun sequencing and DNA metabarcoding approaches for species identification and quantification of pollen species mixtures

A multi-amplicon 16S rRNA sequencing and analysis method for improved taxonomic profiling of bacterial communities

High-resolution microbiome analysis enabled by linking of 16S rRNA gene sequences with adjacent genomic contexts

Accurate Reconstruction of Microbial Strains from Metagenomic Sequencing Using Representative Reference Genomes

Benchmarking bacterial taxonomic classification using nanopore metagenomics data of several mock communities

Improved Microbial Community Characterization of 16S Rrna Via Metagenome Hybridization Capture Enrichment

Microbiome Single Cell Atlases Generated with a Commercial Instrument

Evaluation of metagenomic, 16S rRNA gene and ultra-plexed PCR-based sequencing approaches for profiling antimicrobial resistance gene and bacterial taxonomic composition of polymicrobial samples

Whole genome sequencing approaches for taxonomic profiling and evaluation of wastewater quality

A comparison between Greengenes, SILVA, RDP, and NCBI reference databases in four published microbiota datasets

Metagenomics versus total RNA sequencing: most accurate data-processing tools, microbial identification accuracy and perspectives for ecological assessments

Characterization of the Gut Microbiome Using 16S or Shotgun Metagenomics

Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis

Characterization of Shallow Whole-Metagenome Shotgun Sequencing as a High-Accuracy and Low-Cost Method by Complicated Mock Microbiomes

Impact of training sets on classification of high-throughput bacterial 16s rRNA gene surveys

Multicenter assessment of microbial community profiling using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing

Mock community taxonomic classification performance of publicly available shotgun metagenomics pipelines