Abstract:Microbiome research has grown exponentially in recent years, but methodological variations can easily undermine the reproducibility across studies. To systematically evaluate the comparability of sequencing results of 16S rRNA gene sequencing (16Ss)- and shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMs)-based microbial community profiling in laboratories under routine conditions, we designed a multicenter study across 35 participating laboratories in China using designed mock communities and homogenized fecal samples. We found that the observed microbial compositions of the mock communities in 46.2% (12/26) of the 16Ss and 82.6% (19/23) of the SMs laboratories had significant correlations with the expected result (Spearman r>0.59, P <0.05). DNA extraction methods, amplified regions and bioinformatics analysis tools (taxonomic classifiers and database) were important factors causing interlaboratory deviations. Addressing laboratory contamination is an urgent task because various sources of unexpected microbes were found in negative control samples. Well-defined control samples, such as the mock communities in this study, should be routinely used in microbiome research for monitoring potential biases. These findings will provide guidance in the choice of more reasonable operating procedures to minimize potential methodological biases in revealing human microbiota composition.<ol class="links-for-figure"><li><a class="anchor download-link u-font-sans" href="https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S2090123220301697-ga1_lrg.jpg">Download : Download high-res image (189KB)</a></li><li><a class="anchor download-link u-font-sans" href="https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S2090123220301697-ga1.jpg">Download : Download full-size image</a></li></ol>

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to solve the reproducibility problems caused by methodological differences in microbiome research. Specifically, through a multi - center evaluation, the authors systematically compared the results of microbial community analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing (16Ss) and metagenomic sequencing (SMs) in different laboratories to evaluate the comparability and accuracy of these two sequencing techniques in detecting microbial composition under routine conditions and to discover the factors affecting the accuracy of test results. #### Main problems include: 1. **Methodological differences**: Different laboratories use different DNA extraction methods, PCR primer selections, sequencing platforms and bioinformatics analysis tools, and these differences may lead to the non - reproducibility of experimental results. 2. **Inter - laboratory deviation**: Even for the same sample, the detection results in different laboratories may be significantly different, especially in the detection of low - abundance species. 3. **Contamination problems**: Unexpected microorganisms were detected in negative control samples, indicating that laboratory contamination is a problem that needs to be urgently solved. 4. **Standardization needs**: In order to improve the reproducibility and reliability of microbiome research, it is necessary to establish unified standard operating procedures and quality control measures. ### Solutions The authors solve the problems in the following ways: - **Design a multi - center study**: Invite 35 laboratories in China to participate and use the designed mock communities and homogenized fecal samples for sequencing. - **Evaluate methodological differences**: Through statistical analysis (such as Spearman correlation coefficient, PCA and PERMANOVA), find out the key factors causing inter - laboratory deviation, such as DNA extraction method, PCR amplification region, bioinformatics classifier and reference database, etc. - **Propose improvement suggestions**: It is recommended to use clear control samples (such as mock communities) in microbiome research to monitor potential deviations and optimize the operation process to reduce methodological deviations. ### Conclusion This study provides valuable guidance for microbiome research, emphasizes the importance of standardized operating procedures, and points out the main existing problems and improvement directions, which is helpful to improve the reproducibility and reliability of future microbiome research.

Multicenter assessment of microbial community profiling using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing