What Is the Optimal Radiotherapy Target Size for Non-Operable Esophageal Cancer? A Meta-Analysis

Huiping Zhu,Wei Pan,Yong Chen,Hui Chen,Yun Zuo,Xinchen Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000501594
2019-01-01
Oncology Research and Treatment
Abstract:Definitive radiotherapy has an affirmative role in treating non-operable esophageal cancer; however, the controversy between elective lymph node irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI) still remains. To ascertain the benefits and disadvantages of the two radiation target volumes, we performed a meta-analysis with 7 related publications. According to our findings, patients treated with ENI and IFI had nearly identical 1, 2, and 3-year survival rates (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 1.004, <i>p</i> = 0.980, and pooled OR = 1.15, <i>p</i> = 0.594, and pooled OR = 0.918, <i>p</i> = 0.679, respectively). Likewise, no significant differences were detected in local recurrence rates (pooled OR = 1.04, <i>p</i> = 0.883), regional recurrence rates (pooled OR = 0.65, <i>p</i> = 0.555), and distant metastasis rates (pooled OR = 1.29, <i>p</i> = 0.309) between the two treatment groups. However, IFI could significantly decrease the incidences of acute radiation esophagitis (pooled OR = 2.30, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and late pneumonia (pooled OR = 2.52, <i>p</i> = 0.04) compared with ENI. This meta-analysis provides evidence that IFI is more feasible for non-operable esophageal cancer than ENI.<br/>Oncol Res Treat
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?