Involved-field irradiation or elective-nodal irradiation in neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally-advanced esophageal cancer: comprehensive analysis for dosimetry, treatment-related complications, impact on lymphocyte, patterns of failure and survival

Xianyan Chen,Yingjie Zhang,Xiaojuan Zhou,Min Wang,Feifei Na,Lin Zhou,Yong Xu,Bingwen Zou,Jianxin Xue,Yongmei Liu,Youling Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1274924

IF: 4.7

2023-10-11

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:Purpose: To compare the differences between involved-field irradiation (IFI) and elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in selecting the optimal target area for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 267 patients with LA-ESCC, of whom 165 underwent ENI and 102 underwent IFI. Dosimetry, treatment-related complications, pathological responses, recurrence/metastasis patterns, and survival were compared between the two groups. Results: The median follow-up duration was 27.9 months. The R0 resection rates in the IFI and ENI groups were 95.1% and 92.7%, respectively ( p =0.441), while the pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 42.2% and 34.5%, respectively ( p =0.12). The ENI group received higher radiation doses to the heart (HV 30 :23.9% vs . 18%, p =0.033) and lungs (LV 30 :7.7% vs. 4.9%, p <0.001) than the IFI group. Consequently, the ENI group showed a higher incidence of grade 2 or higher radiation pneumonitis (30.3% vs. 17.6%, p =0.004) and pericardial effusion (26.7% vs. 11.8%, p =0.021) than the IFI group. Post-operation fistulas were observed in 3 (2.9%) and 17 cases (10.3%) in the IFI and ENI groups, respectively ( p =0.026). In the multivariate analysis, smoking, positive lymph node involvement (pN+), and anastomotic fistula were independent predictors of overall survival (OS). The pN+ patients exhibited a greater propensity for recurrence compared to pN- patients, especially in the first year of follow-up (6.67% vs. 0.56%, p =0.003). Conclusion: The ENI group had a higher incidence of radiation-induced adverse events compared to the IFI group, likely due to the higher radiation doses to normal tissues. Considering the similar disease-free survival (DFS) and OS rates in the two groups, IFI may be suitable for nCRT in patients with LA-ESCC, although further prospective studies are warranted.

oncology