Abstract:Signing of the Japanese Instrument of Surrender on September 2, 1945 had formally ended the most destructive and bloody war in the history of mankind. Even before that a new balance of power on the international arena began to form, that would persist for almost half a century. At the same time, it was obvious from the outright that the Allies had very different views on how the post-war world order should look like. Traditionally, both Russian and foreign academic literature focused on their disputes regarding the German question. This paper provides a brief overview of the US Department of State planning and recommendation process for the post-war reconstruction of Japan in 1939–1945, which had eventually led to the formation of the socalled San Francisco subsystem of international relations. The first section of the paper outlines the challenges faced by the State Department when it came to planning the post-war architecture of the Far East. In that regard, the author pays particular attention to the staff shortage, which forced the Department of State to strengthen partnership with private research organizations and involve them in long-term planning. The author emphasizes that if before the United States entered the war the US planners adopted a rather tough stance on Japan, after the attack on Pearl Harbor their approaches paradoxically changed. The second section examines the contradictions and tensions between those politicians and experts who believed that in the establishment of the post-war order in the Far East the US should cooperate with China, and those who promoted rapprochement with Japan. These groups were unofficially referred to as the ‘Chinese team’ and the ‘Japanese crowd’ accordingly. The paper shows that as the end of the war approached, these contradictions gradually faded into the background. The needs to promote the interdepartmental cooperation and to reconcile the positions of the State Department, the Military and Naval Ministries on the future of Japan came to the fore. This work resulted in a series of memoranda, which laid the foundation for the US post-war policy towards Japan. In conclusion the author provides a general assessment of the strategic decision-making process in the United States during wartime and emphasizes its consistency, thoroughness and flexibility. As a result, it enabled the US to achieve what seemed impossible: to turn Japan from an ardent adversary of the United States in the Pacific into one of its most reliable allies, and it remains such today.

US Covert Action in Cold War Japan: The Politics of Cultivating Conservative Elites and its Consequences

Deconstructing Japan’s PR: Where is the Public?

Opposition Politics in Japan: Strategies Under a One-Party Dominant Regime

Democracy Without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State

Factional Competition for the Party Endorsement: The Case of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party

Deconstructing Japan’s PR

Electoral Reform and the Fate of Factions: The Case of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party

On the Aesthetics and Politics of Neoconservatism in Postwar Japan and America

US Financial Crisis,Japanese Introspection and Probing

Hegemonic Cooperation and Conflict: Postwar Japan's China Policy and the United States

Depoliticization and the changing boundaries of governance in Japan

Japan’s Taiwan Policy in the Xi Jinping Era: Moving Toward Strategic Clarity

The Evolution of Political Thought in Japan and Its Impact on Sino-Japanese Relations

Depoliticization or Americanization of Japanese Science Studies

Making reform and stability compatible with each other: elite redeployment in Meiji Japan

The Role of Political Parties in Making Japanese Public Policy (Liberal Democratic Party as a Model)

Development of the US Plans for Post-War Japan during World War II

A Preliminary Analysis on Japan's 45th Lower House Election

Japan's Political Leadership Deficit

Explaining Japan’s post-Cold War security policy trajectory: maritime realism

Japanese Resistance to American Financial Hegemony