Deconstructing Japan’s PR

Nancy Snow
2015-01-01
Abstract:A quarter of a century ago, Karel van Wolferen, a 17-year veteran East Asian correspondent for the Dutch daily newspaper, NRC Handelsblad, published a critical assessment of Japan «s political economy and parliamentary democracy system. The Enigma of Japanese Power: People and Politics in a Stateless Nation (1989) was well received internationally but not in Japan. This was at a time when most of the world «s headlines were trumping the wa (harmony) of corporate and government relations known collectively as® Japan Inc. as well as the rise of Japan as an economic superpower to rival the US. In stark contrast, Karel Van Wolferen described a country still under the military-political protective thumb of the US, its former war nemesis and post-World War Two occupier, and without an active citizen public invested in how the nation was running. His concern then, as it is now, is a propensity in Japan to passivity in democratic government participation (Beeson and Stubbs, 2012). A paradox of Japan is a resilient populace with societal stability driven by kizuna (bonds in human relations), but with a weak political structure (Miura and Walker, 2012). A recent study of East Asian citizen participation by Doh Shin (2012) showed that deferential authoritarian types¥ those who go along with their political leaders and report living either in a full democracy or a democracy with just minor problems¥ were most numerous. Deferential authoritarians are over one-and-a-half times as prevalent as critical democrats (34 per cent versus 21 per cent)¥ citizens of democracies who report living either in a democracy with major problems or a non-democracy …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?