Abstract:Why has Japan shifted towards a more active security posture since the end of the Cold War? Japan's security policy under Prime Minister Abe has triggered numerous discussions on the changing nature of Japan as a security actor. This article identifies two independent variables—the balance of power calculations and secure access to the maritime commons—that informs Japan's security policy trajectory. It argues that Japanese strategy is best described as 'maritime realism', a posture in which liberal internationalist and realist elements draw upon principles of maritime strategy to fuse together. Japan has not only actively facilitated US commitment to maritime Asia but also focused on expanding its role in maritime security as the maritime space in the Indo-Pacific has increasingly become a contested space. While Tokyo's security policy corresponds with structural realist predictions, they have also been frequently expressed in liberal internationalist language given the peculiar nature of the role of navies. This article's findings advance theoretical debates on alliance politics and great power competition by integrating international relations and concepts in strategic studies. It also contains significant explanatory power in assessing the trajectory of Japan's defence policy since the end of the Cold War.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Why has Japan shifted to a more active security policy since the end of the Cold War?**
Specifically, the author Takuya Matsuda attempts to explain the changes in Japan's security policy trajectory after the Cold War. The article explores two key independent variables:
1. **Balance of power calculations**
2. **Secure access to the maritime commons**
The author believes that Japan's security policy can be best described as "maritime realism", a strategy that combines elements of liberal internationalism and realism, with particular emphasis on the principles of maritime strategy.
### Main problem decomposition
#### 1. Why has Japan shifted to a more active security policy?
- **Changes in the international environment after the Cold War**: After the end of the Cold War, Japan faced new changes in the international structure, especially the rise of China's military power and the threat from North Korea.
- **Reforms of the Abe government**: During the Shinzo Abe government, Japan implemented a series of security reforms, including reinterpreting Article 9 of the Peace Constitution to allow for the right of collective self - defense, and strengthening the legal framework of national security institutions.
#### 2. What do these changes mean for Japan's future military role?
- **Theoretical and empirical significance**: These changes not only have broad theoretical and empirical significance for understanding alliance politics and great - power competition, but also reveal Japan's defense policy trajectory in the post - Cold War era.
#### 3. Reconciliation of realism and liberal internationalism
- **Realist view**: Some realists believe that Japan's security policy changes are mainly in response to the growing military challenges in the region, especially those from China.
- **Liberal internationalist view**: Japanese government officials use liberal internationalist discourses such as "shared values" to explain policy changes, emphasizing Japan's active role in international security.
### Core contributions of the paper
By introducing the concept of "maritime realism", the author attempts to reconcile these two different explanatory paths. He believes that Japan's security policy, within a realist framework, combines the principles of maritime strategy, both supporting the US naval dominance in Asia and actively promoting a maritime order based on the rule of law.
### Formula representation (if applicable)
Although this article mainly involves international relations and strategic studies, in order to ensure the accuracy of the formula format, the following are some conceptual formulas that may be involved in the article:
- **Balance of power calculation**: \[ \text{Power Balance} = f(\text{Military Capabilities}, \text{Economic Strength}, \text{Geopolitical Position}) \]
- **Secure access to maritime channels**: \[ \text{Secure Access} = g(\text{Naval Power}, \text{International Law}, \text{Regional Cooperation}) \]
These formulas are presented in Markdown format to ensure the correctness and readability of the formulas.
### Conclusion
In general, this paper aims to explain the evolution of Japan's security policy since the end of the Cold War, and by introducing the concept of "maritime realism", provides a comprehensive theoretical framework to help understand Japan's defense policy changes in the post - Cold War era.