Power Shift,Identity Conflict,and Strategic Choice——The Strategy for Future Sino-Japanese Relations

Zhu Feng
2007-01-01
Abstract:Neorealism assumes that a power shift will inevitably lead to a reorientation of policy. Thus, defensive realism, one branch of the family of neorealist theory, argues that the choice of a new strategy can include balancing, bandwagoning, shirking, or buck passing. The option ultimately followed largely depends on “domestic variables,” one of which is identity conflict. The complicated Sino-Japanese tensions since the early 21st century seemingly validate the proposition that a combination of a power shift and identity conflict will definitely result in a deterioration of bilateral relations. However, Sino-Japanese relations have been more susceptible to “great power rivalry” than to “great power tensions.” Such rivalry is not unstoppable but it is already notable. An adequate explanation of the transformation requires the introduction of a new intervening variable into the analysis. The paper identifies Tokyo’s strategic choice as a leading variable to explain why Sino-Japanese relations deteriorated and to estimate their future prospects. Japan’s strategic choice to stand up to its presumed China threat, psychologically, institutionally, and strategically in the days to come will determine its increasingly assertive posture vis-à-via China.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?