Abstract:Corporate sustainability reports are supposed to provide a complete and balanced picture of corporate sustainability performance. They are, however, usually voluntary and thus prone to interpretation and even greenwashing tendencies. To overcome this problem, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) provides standardized reporting guidelines challenging companies to report positive and negative aspects of an organization’s sustainability performance. However, the reporting of “negative aspects” in particular can endanger corporate legitimacy if perceived by the stakeholders as not being in line with societal norms and values. Starting from the theoretical lenses of economics-based disclosure theories and socio-political theories of disclosure, the focus of this study therefore was to analyze the communicative legitimation strategies companies use to report “negative aspects,” i.e., negative ecological and social impact caused by corporate activity. Using qualitative content analysis of GRI-oriented sustainability reports from companies listed on the US Dow Jones Industrial Average Index and on the German DAX Index, we identified six legitimation strategies. We discuss these strategies regarding to symbolic and substantial management of legitimacy. We show that symbolic legitimation strategies aiming at modifying the perception of legitimizing stakeholders dominate in the reports at hand. Such persuasion, however, does not meet the requirement of impartiality as postulated by the GRI guidelines. Building upon this conclusion we propose a concise characterization of “negative aspects” and develop a GRI-compliant schema of reporting about them. In doing so, we offer a way to improve the overall “balance” of sustainability reporting contributing to a true and fair view in sustainability disclosure.

Legitimation Strategies as Valuable Signals in Nonfinancial Reporting? Effects on Investor Decision-Making

Legitimizing Negative Aspects in GRI-Oriented Sustainability Reporting: A Qualitative Analysis of Corporate Disclosure Strategies

The benefit of virtue signaling: Corporate sleight-of-hand positively influences consumers' judgments about "social license to operate"

Signaling sustainability: Differential reaction of the stock market following the announcement of sustainability-linked bonds

Mandatory Disclosure of Standardized Sustainability Metrics: The Case of the EU Taxonomy Regulation

On the Role of Institutional Logics in Legitimacy Evaluations: The Effects of Pricing and CSR Signals on Organizational Legitimacy

Preventive and Remedial Actions in Corporate Reporting Among "Addiction Industries": Legitimacy, Effectiveness and Hypocrisy Perception

Sustainability‐related Transgressions in Global Supply Chains: When do Legitimacy Spillovers Hurt Buying Firms the Most?

The impact of voluntary sustainability reporting on firm value: Insights from signaling theory

The Role of Formal Third-Party Endorsements and Informal Self-Proclaiming Signals in Nonprofit Reputation Building

Institutional Investor Legal Origins and Corporate GHG Emissions Disclosure Quality

Corporate sustainability and financial performance: Collective reputation as moderator of the relationship between environmental performance and firm market value

A theoretical framework for ESG reporting to investors

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Organizational Stigma: The Case of “Sin” Industries

Corporate SDG performance and investor trading behavior

Building Institutions Based on Information Disclosure: Lessons from GRI's Sustainability Reporting

CSR signals: exploring their use in controversial industries

Signalling through accountability reporting for family firms: Does the institutional environment matter?

Earnings management and sustainability assurance: The moderating role of CSR committee

Stigma as moral insurance: How stigma buffers firms from the market consequences of greenwashing