Abstract:Nafion, the state-of-the-art-of proton exchange membrane in fuel cell, is a copolymer with a randomly tethered side-chain terminated by a pendant sulfonic acid groups adjacent to the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) backbone. The PTFE backbone is hydrophobic and insulative, whereas the sulfonic acid groups are hydrophilic and proton-conductive. As a result of the intrinsic difference between the backbone and sulfonic acid groups, phase separation occurs during the formation of solid Nafion membranes from ionomer solution via a self-organizing process conducted at elevated temperature. The ionic clusters are formed in hydrophobic matrix by hydrophilic groups, interconnected by slender ionic channels which serve as the proton conductive pathways. Furthermore, the distribution of proton-conductive pathways not only inside but on the surface of the membrane plays a significant role in improving the cell performance. The latter determines the mass transport of H 2 O molecules and protons through the membrane, which is the basis of good performance in fuel cells. In addition, the three-phase boundary (TPB) plays a crucial role in the performance of fuel cells, which means that the electrocatalysts (such as Pt) in fuel cells must directly contact with the conductive hydrophilic regions on the surface of PEMs to minimize the contact resistance and invalid catalysts located in the hydrophobic regions will lead to lower catalyst utilization. However, an excess of hydrophilic groups would cause flooding, and the hydrophobic phase is necessary for supporting mechanical strength and separating reagents in fuel cells. Therefore, in order to further promote fuel cell performance, detailed knowledge of phase separation with Nafion is required, and a good balance between the distributions of hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups is extremely crucial for promising ion exchange membranes. Currently, current-sensing AFM is often used to obtain the imaging of local surface proton conductance. However, the direct current (DC) applied leads to an overall result that is affected by many factors, such as proton conductivity, mass transport and reaction kinetics. Compared to DC methods, alternate current (AC) methods such as electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) provides a powerful insight to the overall impedance response and individual processes including ionic transport can be distinguished at higher accuracy. In our study, we constructed a home-built AFM-EIS setup and measured the localized impedance by coupling AFM with an impedance tester in a Faraday cage. In contrast to traditional average and macroscopic bulk impedance measurements, we obtained a detailed and spatially diverse distribution of EIS spectra at selected points on Nafion with AFM-EIS. By equivalent electric circuit fitting, we derived the localized pure proton transfer resistance from the EIS spectra; such results cannot be obtained by current-sensing AFM. In addition, with a customized automatic procedure, we performed proton transfer resistance imaging on the Nafion surface in an area of 2 µm*2 µm at different humidities, the results of which confirmed the widely known fact that higher water activities significantly reduce the transport resistance. However, our experimental results show a wide variation in proton transport resistance at a well-equilibrated humidity level of the membrane. Our work has led to the conclusion that the large variation arises mainly from the surface concentration of water channels due to the fact that the transport and reaction kinetics are favoured by the three-phase interface. Furthermore, to elucidate the Nafion microstructure, a numerical simulation was constructed to incorporate morphological and physical variations of the membrane, such as the heterogeneity of the hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups in the membrane, which revealed that at higher water activities, SO 3 H groups cluster to create a matrix of interconnected nano-water channels through which the ions are transported. Figure 1

Does power ultrasound affect Nafion® dispersions?

Effects of Microstructure on the Retention of Proton Conductivity of Nafion/SiO2 Composite Membranes at Elevated Temperatures:An in Situ SAXS Study

Localized Electrochemical Impedance Measurements on Nafion Membranes: Observation and Analysis of Spatially Diverse Proton Transport Using Atomic Force Microscopy

Aspects of the Chemical Degradation of Pfsa Ionomers Used in Pem Fuel Cells

Effects of Dispersion Solvents on Proton Conduction Behavior of Ultrathin Nafion Films in the Catalyst Layers of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

How the Morphology of Nafion-Based Membranes Affects Proton Transport

Plasma treatment of nafion membranes: Understanding the trade-off between surface modification and electrochemical degradation

Modification for Uniform Surface of Nafion Ultrathin Film Deposited by Inkjet Printing

Properties of Nafion® NR-211 membranes for PEMFCs

Iridium Surface Oxide Affects the Nafion Interface in Proton-Exchange-Membrane Water Electrolysis

Impact of SiO2 Modification on the Performance of Nafion Composite Membrane

Longitudinal strand ordering leads to shear thinning in Nafion

Enhanced properties of Nafion nanofibrous proton exchange membranes by altering the electrospinning solvents

The Degradation Study of Nafion/Ptfe Composite Membrane in Pem Fuel Cell under Accelerated Stress Tests

Impacts of Catalyst Nanolayers on Water Permeation and Swelling of Polymer Electrolyte Membranes

Effect of Sulfonation Conditions on Properties of Ion-Conducting Membranes Based on Polystyrene Grafted on Gamma-Irradiated Polyvinylidene Fluoride Films

Influence of ionomer content on the structure and performance of PEFC membrane electrode assemblies

Understanding the Mechanism of Hydrogen Transport in Imidazolyl Polymers Doped Nafion Membranes Via Molecular Dynamics Simulations: Case of PVMZ/Nafion

Impact of Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone) Pretreatments on Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Performances and Durability

The Importance of Ion Selectivity of Perfluorinated Sulfonic Acid Membrane for the Performance of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Impact of Catalyst Ink Dispersing Methodology on Fuel Cell Performance Using in-Situ X-ray Scattering