Abstract:Over the past few years, many machine learning-based scoring functions for predicting the binding of small molecules to proteins have been developed. Their objective is to approximate the distribution which takes two molecules as input and outputs the energy of their interaction. Only a scoring function that accounts for the interatomic interactions involved in binding can accurately predict binding affinity on unseen molecules. However, many scoring functions make predictions based on data set biases rather than an understanding of the physics of binding. These scoring functions perform well when tested on similar targets to those in the training set but fail to generalize to dissimilar targets. To test what a machine learning-based scoring function has learned, input attribution, a technique for learning which features are important to a model when making a prediction on a particular data point, can be applied. If a model successfully learns something beyond data set biases, attribution should give insight into the important binding interactions that are taking place. We built a machine learning-based scoring function that aimed to avoid the influence of bias via thorough train and test data set filtering and show that it achieves comparable performance on the Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions, 2016 (CASF-2016) benchmark to other leading methods. We then use the CASF-2016 test set to perform attribution and find that the bonds identified as important by PointVS, unlike those extracted from other scoring functions, have a high correlation with those found by a distance-based interaction profiler. We then show that attribution can be used to extract important binding pharmacophores from a given protein target when supplied with a number of bound structures. We use this information to perform fragment elaboration and see improvements in docking scores compared to using structural information from a traditional, data-based approach. This not only provides definitive proof that the scoring function has learned to identify some important binding interactions but also constitutes the first deep learning-based method for extracting structural information from a target for molecule design.

Incorporating Explicit Water Molecules and Ligand Conformation Stability in Machine-Learning Scoring Functions

Optimization of Molecular Docking Scores with Support Vector Rank Regression

A Case-Based Meta-Learning Algorithm Boosts the Performance of Structure-Based Virtual Screening.

Improving protein–ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term

A Generalized Protein-Ligand Scoring Framework with Balanced Scoring, Docking, Ranking and Screening Powers.

A fully differentiable ligand pose optimization framework guided by deep learning and traditional scoring functions

A fully differentiable ligand pose optimization framework guided by deep learning and a traditional scoring function

Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein–Ligand Scoring Functions

Machine‐learning scoring functions for structure‐based drug lead optimization

Further Development and Validation of Empirical Scoring Functions for Structure-Based Binding Affinity Prediction

Delta Score: Improving the Binding Assessment of Structure-Based Drug Design Methods

A Small Step Toward Generalizability: Training a Machine Learning Scoring Function for Structure-Based Virtual Screening

Synergistic Application of Molecular Docking and Machine Learning for Improved Binding Pose

DockingApp RF: A State-of-the-Art Novel Scoring Function for Molecular Docking in a User-Friendly Interface to AutoDock Vina

From machine learning to deep learning: Advances in scoring functions for protein–ligand docking

Water Network-Augmented Two-State Model for Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction

DeepBSP—a Machine Learning Method for Accurate Prediction of Protein–Ligand Docking Structures

Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening Ability by Integrating Multiple Energy Auxiliary Terms from Molecular Docking Scoring.

Protein–Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era

Docking Score ML: Target-Specific Machine Learning Models Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening in 155 Targets

Can Machine Learning Consistently Improve the Scoring Power of Classical Scoring Functions? Insights into the Role of Machine Learning in Scoring Functions.