Abstract:Structure-based drug design depends on the detailed knowledge of the three-dimensional (3D) structures of protein–ligand binding complexes, but accurate prediction of ligand-binding poses is still a major challenge for molecular docking due to deficiency of scoring functions (SFs) and ignorance of protein flexibility upon ligand binding. In this study, based on a cross-docking dataset dedicatedly constructed from the PDBbind database, we developed several XGBoost-trained classifiers to discriminate the near-native binding poses from decoys, and systematically assessed their performance with/without the involvement of the cross-docked poses in the training/test sets. The calculation results illustrate that using Extended Connectivity Interaction Features (ECIF), Vina energy terms and docking pose ranks as the features can achieve the best performance, according to the validation through the random splitting or refined-core splitting and the testing on the re-docked or cross-docked poses. Besides, it is found that, despite the significant decrease of the performance for the threefold clustered cross-validation, the inclusion of the Vina energy terms can effectively ensure the lower limit of the performance of the models and thus improve their generalization capability. Furthermore, our calculation results also highlight the importance of the incorporation of the cross-docked poses into the training of the SFs with wide application domain and high robustness for binding pose prediction. The source code and the newly-developed cross-docking datasets can be freely available at https://github.com/sc8668/ml_pose_prediction and https://zenodo.org/record/5525936 , respectively, under an open-source license. We believe that our study may provide valuable guidance for the development and assessment of new machine learning-based SFs (MLSFs) for the predictions of protein–ligand binding poses.

A fully differentiable ligand pose optimization framework guided by deep learning and traditional scoring functions

A fully differentiable ligand pose optimization framework guided by deep learning and a traditional scoring function

From machine learning to deep learning: Advances in scoring functions for protein–ligand docking

A Generalized Protein-Ligand Scoring Framework with Balanced Scoring, Docking, Ranking and Screening Powers.

Synergistic Application of Molecular Docking and Machine Learning for Improved Binding Pose

Improving protein–ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term

Harnessing Deep Learning for Enhanced Ligand Docking.

Advancing Ligand Docking through Deep Learning: Challenges and Prospects in Virtual Screening

Incorporating Explicit Water Molecules and Ligand Conformation Stability in Machine-Learning Scoring Functions

Deep Scoring Neural Network Replacing the Scoring Function Components to Improve the Performance of Structure-Based Molecular Docking.

Uni-Mol Docking V2: Towards Realistic and Accurate Binding Pose Prediction

Rescoring Ligand Docking Poses.

DeltaDock: A Unified Framework for Accurate, Efficient, and Physically Reliable Molecular Docking

DeepBSP—a Machine Learning Method for Accurate Prediction of Protein–Ligand Docking Structures

Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein–Ligand Scoring Functions

Exploration on Learning Molecular Docking with Deep Learning Models

The Impact of Cross-Docked Poses on Performance of Machine Learning Classifier for Protein–ligand Binding Pose Prediction

Addressing docking pose selection with structure-based deep learning: Recent advances, challenges and opportunities

Enhancing Ligand Pose Sampling for Molecular Docking

Protein–Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era

Efficient Exploration of Chemical Space with Docking and Deep Learning