Abstract:The demand for better representation of cultural considerations in environmental management is increasingly evident. As two cases in point, ecosystem service approaches increasingly include cultural services, and resource planners recognize indigenous constituents and the cultural knowledge they hold as key to good environmental management. Accordingly, collaborations between anthropologists, planners, decision makers and biodiversity experts about the subject of culture are increasingly common-but also commonly fraught. Those whose expertise is culture often engage in such collaborations because they worry a practitioner from 'elsewhere' will employ a 'measure of culture' that is poorly or naively conceived. Those from an economic or biophysical training must grapple with the intangible properties of culture as they intersect with economic, biological or other material measures. This paper seeks to assist those who engage in collaborations to characterize cultural benefits or impacts relevant to decision-making in three ways; by: (i) considering the likely mindset of would-be collaborators; (ii) providing examples of tested approaches that might enable innovation; and (iii) characterizing the kinds of obstacles that are in principle solvable through methodological alternatives. We accomplish these tasks in part by examining three cases wherein culture was a critical variable in environmental decision making: risk management in New Zealand associated with Māori concerns about genetically modified organisms; cultural services to assist marine planning in coastal British Columbia; and a decision-making process involving a local First Nation about water flows in a regulated river in western Canada. We examine how 'culture' came to be manifest in each case, drawing from ethnographic and cultural-models interviews and using subjective metrics (recommended by theories of judgment and decision making) to express cultural concerns. We conclude that the characterization of cultural benefits and impacts is least amenable to methodological solution when prevailing cultural worldviews contain elements fundamentally at odds with efforts to quantify benefits/impacts, but that even in such cases some improvements are achievable if decision-makers are flexible regarding processes for consultation with community members and how quantification is structured.

Distinguishing Units of Analysis, Procedures, and Processes in Cultural Selection: Notes on Metacontingency Terminology

Cross-Cultural Research Methods: Review and Prospect

Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management

Behavior Analysis of Culture in Brazilian Psychology Graduate Programs: A Literature Review

The Need for Advancement in the Conceptualization of Cultural Competence

Use and misuse of the concept of culture

A mediational theory of equivalence relations and transformation of function

Of Mice and Culture: How Beliefs About Knowing Affect Habits of Thinking

The Comparative Method in Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Research

Advancing Our Understanding of Culture Mixing

Culturally-Guided Beliefs about Opposing Categories and Their Consequences for Action: the Case of Cooperation and Competition

Measuring culture outside the head: a meta-analysis of individualism-collectivism in cultural products

Patterns of conceptual interaction

Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A comment on baeyens, eelen, and van den bergh

Exploratory Study of Equivalence under Conjoint Select and Reject Control

Disentangling the effects of culture and language on measurement noninvariance in cross-cultural research: The culture, comprehension, and translation bias (CCT) procedure.

Culture, salience, and psychiatric diagnosis: exploring the concept of cultural congruence & its practical application

Comparative Culturology and Cross-Cultural Psychology: How Comparing Societal Cultures Differs From Comparing Individuals' Minds Across Cultures

Old and New Perspectives on the Nature/Culture Opposition in Biology and Anthropology

Inching Toward a Unified Metatheory for Psychology