Abstract:Accurate assessment of animal emotion (affect) is an important goal in animal welfare science, and in areas such as neuroscience and psychopharmacology. Direct measures of conscious emotion are not available, so assessment of animal affect has relied on measures of the behavioural and physiological components of affective states. These are important indicators but have some limitations (e.g. measuring emotional arousal rather than valence (positivity vs negativity)). Human psychology research suggests that changes in cognitive function (information processing) can also be reliable indicators of emotional state (especially valence). For example, people in negative states attend to threats, retrieve negative memories, and make negative judgements about ambiguous stimuli more than happier people. Here we review a new research area investigating the possibility that such affect-induced ‘cognitive biases’ also occur in animals. We focus on a novel ‘judgement bias’ paradigm in which animals are trained that one cue predicts a positive event and another cue predicts a less positive/negative event, and are then presented with ambiguous (intermediate) cues. The hypothesis is that animals in a negative affective state will be more likely to respond to (‘judge’) these ambiguous cues as if they predict the negative event (a ‘pessimistic’ response), than animals in a more positive state. Recent studies of rats, dogs, rhesus monkeys, starlings and humans provide face-value support for this hypothesis. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the affect manipulation treatments used in these studies, and the possibility that treatment-induced changes in feeding motivation, general activity and learning are responsible for the effects observed, and we consider whether the type of bias observed and the precise design of the judgement bias task can provide information about different types of affective state. Judgement biases may result from the influence of affect on decision-making processes including attention to and perception of the ambiguous cue, evaluation of the value and probability (expected utility) of the outcomes of different responses, and action selection. Affect might also modulate general tendencies of loss, risk and ambiguity aversion, hence biasing decisions. We discuss these possibilities in relation to theory and findings from neurobiological and psychological studies of decision-making, in order to better understand the potential mechanisms underlying judgement biases. We conclude with some specific recommendations for study design and interpretation, and suggestions for future research in this area.

Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A comment on baeyens, eelen, and van den bergh

Human evaluative conditioning: Acquisition trials, presentation schedule, evaluative style and contingency awareness

When All Is Revealed: A Dissociation between Evaluative Learning and Contingency Awareness

Evaluative conditioning may occur with and without contingency awareness

Beyond contingency awareness: the role of influence awareness in resisting conditioned attitudes

When congruence breeds preference: the influence of selective attention processes on evaluative conditioning

Affective learning: Awareness and aversion

Acquiring favorable attitudes based on aversive affective cues: Examining the spontaneity and efficiency of propositional evaluative conditioning

Influence of contingency awareness on neural, electrodermal and evaluative responses during fear conditioning

Contingency awareness in human aversive conditioning involves the middle frontal gyrus

The role of contingency awareness, involvement, and need for cognition in attitude formation

Evaluative conditioning of conflict aversiveness and its effects on adaptive control

Aversive conditioning, anxiety, and the strategic control of attention

Signal detection analysis of contingency assessment: Associative interference and nonreinforcement impact cue-outcome contingency sensitivity, whereas cue density affects bias.

The role of prospective contingency in the control of behavior and dopamine signals during associative learning

Do uncontrolled processes contribute to evaluative learning? Insights from a new two-US process dissociation procedure and ambivalence measures

Individual differences in the perception of cue-outcome contingencies: A signal detection analysis

Aversive conditioning in oddball paradigm modulates multisensory integration, attention and emotional processing

The role of selective attention in implicit learning: evidence for a contextual cueing effect of task-irrelevant features

Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms

Observational learning of threat-related attentional bias