Abstract:Abstract It has been proposed that the deployment of selective attention to perceptual and memory representations might be governed by similar cognitive processes and neural resources. However, evidence for this simple and appealing proposal remains inconclusive, which might be due to a considerable divergence in tasks and cognitive demands when comparing attentional selection in memory versus perception. To examine whether selection in both domains share common attentional processes and only differ in the stimuli they act upon (external vs. internal), we compared behavioral costs or benefits between selection domains. In both domains, participants had to attend a target stimulus from a set of simultaneously presented stimuli or simultaneously active memory representations, respectively, with set, target, or both, being repeated or changed across trials. The results of two experiments delineated principal similarities and differences of selection processes in both domains: While positive priming from stimulus repetition was found in both selection domains, we found no consistent effects of negative priming when shifting the focus of attention to a previously to-be-ignored stimulus. However, priming in the perception task was mainly due to repetitions of the target feature (here: color), whereas for the memory task, repetition of the same set of stimulus representations was most important. We propose that the differences can be attributed to a reduced cognitive effort when the now relevant memory representation had already been pre-activated (even as a distractor) in the previous trial. Additionally, our experiments both underscore the importance of taking stimulus–response associations into account, which may be a hidden factor behind differences between domains. We conclude that any attempt of comparing internal versus external attentional selection has to consider inherent differences in selection dynamics across representational domains.

When congruence breeds preference: the influence of selective attention processes on evaluative conditioning

Enhancement of perceptual representations by endogenous attention biases competition in response selection

Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict – controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect

Selective attention effects on recognition: the roles of list context and perceptual difficulty

Stimulus-Stimulus Versus Stimulus-Valence Learning in Evaluative Conditioning: Insights on the Ecological Conditions of Unconditioned Stimulus Revaluation Effects

Attentional adjustment in priming tasks: control strategies depend on context

Investigating the mechanisms by which selective attention affects subsequent preferences and choice

Overlapping neural representations for selection in attention and working memory

Acquiring favorable attitudes based on aversive affective cues: Examining the spontaneity and efficiency of propositional evaluative conditioning

Flanker tasks based on congruency manipulation are biased measures of selective attention in perceptual load studies

Selective attention to stimulus representations in perception and memory: commonalities and differences

Value Associations Modulate Visual Attention and Response Selection

The role of selective attention in implicit learning: evidence for a contextual cueing effect of task-irrelevant features

Top-down modulation of lateral interactions in early vision: does attention affect integration of the whole or just perception of the parts?

Dissociating selectivity adjustments from temporal learning-introducing the context-dependent proportion congruency effect

The effect of irrelevant pairings on evaluative responses

Aversive conditioning, anxiety, and the strategic control of attention

Is subliminal face processing modulated by attentional task sets? Evidence from masked priming effects in a gender decision task

Effects of Feature-selective and Spatial Attention at Different Stages of Visual Processing

Selective attention to pitch amid conflicting auditory information: context-coding and filtering strategies

Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A comment on baeyens, eelen, and van den bergh