Abstract:Converging evidence recently put forward the notion that dedicated neurocognitive mechanisms do exist for the suppression of salient, but irrelevant distractors. Along this line, it is plausible to hypothesize that, in appropriate contexts, experience-dependent forms of attentional learning might selectively induce plastic changes within this dedicated circuitry, thus allowing an independent shaping of priorities at the service of attentional filtering. Conversely, previous work suggested that statistical learning (SL) of both target and distractor spatial probability distributions converge in adjusting only the overall attentional priority of locations: in fact, in the presence of an independent manipulation, either related to the target or to the distractor only, SL induces indirect effects (e.g., changes in filtering efficiency due to an uneven distribution of targets), suggesting that SL-induced plastic changes affect a shared neural substrate. Here we tested whether, when (conflicting) target- and distractor-related manipulations are concurrently applied to the very same locations, dedicated mechanisms might support the selective encoding of spatial priority in relation to the specific attentional operation involved. In three related experiments, human healthy participants discriminated the direction of a target arrow, while ignoring a salient distractor, if present; both target and distractor spatial probability distributions were concurrently manipulated in relation to each single location. Critically, the selection bias produced by the target-related SL was marginally reduced by an adverse distractor contingency, and the suppression bias generated by the distractor-related SL was erased, or even reversed, by an adverse target contingency. Our results suggest that even conflicting target- and distractor-related SL manipulations result in the adjustment of a unique spatial priority computation, likely because the process directly relies on direct plastic alterations of shared spatial priority map(s).

Dissociating selectivity adjustments from temporal learning-introducing the context-dependent proportion congruency effect

Dissociated roles of the parietal and frontal cortices in the scope and control of attention during visual working memory.

Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict – controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect

Understanding the PD and the N2pc: Modeling the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Spatial Attention Shifts

Temporal Learning and List-Level Proportion Congruency: Conflict Adaptation or Learning When to Respond?

Attentional adjustment in priming tasks: control strategies depend on context

Context Modulates Early Stimulus Processing when Resolving Stimulus-response Conflict

Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect

Congruency sequence effects and previous response times: conflict adaptation or temporal learning?

Dissociable Early Attentional Control Mechanisms Underlying Cognitive and Affective Conflicts

Selective attention effects on recognition: the roles of list context and perceptual difficulty

When congruence breeds preference: the influence of selective attention processes on evaluative conditioning

Enhancement of perceptual representations by endogenous attention biases competition in response selection

Electrophysiological correlates of proportion congruency manipulation in a temporal flanker task

The list-wide proportion congruency effect is larger when the distractor precedes the target: Evidence for conflict-independent control in the prime-probe task

The role of selective attention in implicit learning: evidence for a contextual cueing effect of task-irrelevant features

Functional dissociations versus post-hoc selection: Moving beyond the Stockart et al. (2024) compromise

Functional Dissociation of Latency-Variable, Stimulus- and Response-Locked Target P3 Sub-components in Task-Switching

Robust evidence for proactive conflict adaptation in the proportion-congruent paradigm.

The proactive and reactive mechanisms of learned spatial suppression

Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation