Abstract:Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to compare conflict management behaviors of American and Chinese managers. Its main aim is to uncover cultural differences in the way Chinese and American managers approach conflict - thereby developing a more thorough understanding of conflict management across cultures.Design/methodology/approach - Inductive analysis is used to uncover conflict management constructs that are unique to each culture. Structured interviews and multidimensional scaling techniques are used.Findings - Results show that the conflict management behaviors suggested by American and Chinese managers are different. For Chinese managers alone, embarrassing the colleague and teaching a moral lesson is an important element. For American managers alone, hostility and vengefulness are important elements. Results suggest that both cultures acknowledge avoidant approaches, but the underlying intentions for Americans alone are associated with a lack of confidence.Research limitations/implications - Results are based on one conflict scenario and the participants are managers working in mainland China. These factors may limit the generalizability of the results.Practical implications - The findings of this paper suggest that managers should consider cultural differences in conflict management when diagnosing and intervening in conflict situations in different cultures.Originality/value - The authors present new concepts for potential inclusion in a comprehensive model of conflict management. The authors illustrate the value of using an inductive approach to improve our understanding of conflict management across cultures.

Cross-Cultural Research Methods: Review and Prospect

Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research

Studies on Cross-Cultural Communication

Cross-Cultural Differences In Conflict Management An Inductive Study Of Chinese And American Managers

Cross-cultural analysis in online community research: A literature review

Principles and Practices of Methodology and Methods in Cross-Cultural Psychology

Comparative International Business Research Methods

Navigating cross-cultural research: methodological and ethical considerations

Cross-cultural management research: Topics, paradigms, and methods—A journal-based longitudinal analysis between 2001 and 2018

On Detecting Systematic Measurement Error in Cross-Cultural Research: A Review and Critical Reflection on Equivalence and Invariance Tests

Cross-Cultural Values: A Meta-Analysis of Major Quantitative Studies in the Last Decade (2010–2020)

Comparative Culturology and Cross-Cultural Psychology: How Comparing Societal Cultures Differs From Comparing Individuals' Minds Across Cultures

The Comparative Method in Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Research

Cross-Cultural Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Problems in cross-cultural contact: A literature review

Cross‐cultural advertising research: where we have been and where we need to go

Cross-cultural, developmental psychology: Integrating approaches and key insights

Cross-Cultural Management Studies: State of the Field in the Four Research Paradigms*

A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus

Do Not Cross Me: Optimizing the Use of Cross-Sectional Designs

The Study on Culture Survey in the Cross-Culture Management