Abstract:In the face of mounting global climatic pressures, negative emission technologies (NETs) for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) are increasingly proposed as necessary for meeting climate targets. While initial work has identified the potential of terrestrial NETs, a diverse set of marine/ocean-based NETs are gaining new and particular attention. Emerging studies on the feasibility of marine NETs are urgently needed, especially to explore the logics that public groups use to judge different approaches, and to ensure that design and governance of these technologies align with public values and priorities. This study explores factors of interest in understanding public views on four marine NETs, both perceptions of climate severity and urgency, and beliefs about marine environments. It uses a quantitative survey to explore how a representative sample of people in British Columbia, Canada and Washington state, United States evaluate four marine NETs: coastal restoration; ocean alkalinity enhancement; ocean fertilization; and offshore direct air carbon capture and storage. We find that perceived severity and urgency of climate change predicts greater comfort with all NETs studied, and views of marine environments as adaptable, fragile and manageable vary in predicting both greater and lesser comfort. Drawing upon these insights, the paper offers reflections on the conditional thinking linked with emerging views of marine NETs, concluding with methodological suggestions for future research on public perceptions as concerns the deployment of ocean-based CDR near and long term. Incorporating these insights into policy for ocean-based CDR will be important to ensuring responsible governance of these technologies. Key policy insights Incorporating research on public perceptions will be important to the design of marine NETs and accompanying policies. Public groups in both British Columbia and Washington expressed high levels of comfort with coastal restoration, some comfort with offshore direct air carbon capture and storage, and some discomfort with ocean alkalinity enhancement and ocean fertilization. Perceived severity and urgency of climate change predicted greater comfort with all approaches; this evidence aligns with a small but growing body of scholarship indicating openness to environmental intervention amongst public groups concerned with climate impacts. Beliefs about marine environments, namely whether they are 'adaptable', 'manageable' or 'fragile', also predicted comfort, suggesting that CDR in ocean contexts requires further examination regarding public perceptions.

Risk communication and public engagement in CCS projects: the foundations of public acceptability

Public perceived risks and benefits of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS): Scale development and validation

Communicating leakage risk in the hydrogen economy: Lessons already learned from geoenergy industries

Factors Shaping Public Support for More Carbon Capture and Storage Projects in the United States

Social Influence, Risk and Benefit Perceptions, and the Acceptability of Risky Energy Technologies: An Explanatory Model of Nuclear Power Versus Shale Gas

Public perception and acceptance of CCUS: preliminary findings of a qualitative case study in Greece

Behavioural frameworks to understand public perceptions of and risk response to carbon dioxide removal

How public cognition influences public acceptance of CCUS in China: Based on the ABC (affect, behavior, and cognition) model of attitudes

Public acceptance investigation for 2 million tons/year flue gas CO2 capture, transportation and oil displacement storage project

Uncovering opinions on the unfamiliar: Investigating the attitude atmosphere around CCUS through media discourses

Risk Assessment Regarding Perceived Toxicity and Acceptance of Carbon Dioxide-Based Fuel by Laypeople for Its Use in Road Traffic and Aviation

Deliberative Decarbonisation? Assessing the Potential of an Ethical Governance Framework for Low-Carbon Energy through the Case of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage

Public understanding of risk and risk governance

Public evaluations of four approaches to ocean-based carbon dioxide removal

Public perceptions of carbon dioxide removal in the United States and the United Kingdom

Different Risks—Different Views: How Hydrogen Infrastructure Is Linked to Societal Risk Perception

A Three-Stage Psychosocial Engineering-Based Method to Support Controversy and Promote Mutual Understanding between Stakeholders: The Case of CO2 Geological Storage

Public acceptance towards plastic waste-to-energy gasification projects: The role of social trust and health consciousness

The effect of monitoring complexity on stakeholder acceptance of CO2 geological storage projects in the US gulf coast region

Searching for a Public in Controversies over Carbon Dioxide Removal: An Issue Mapping Study on BECCS and Afforestation

Corporate Environmental Risk Communication: Cases and Practices Along the Texas Gulf Coast