Abstract:In the face of mounting global climatic pressures, negative emission technologies (NETs) for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) are increasingly proposed as necessary for meeting climate targets. While initial work has identified the potential of terrestrial NETs, a diverse set of marine/ocean-based NETs are gaining new and particular attention. Emerging studies on the feasibility of marine NETs are urgently needed, especially to explore the logics that public groups use to judge different approaches, and to ensure that design and governance of these technologies align with public values and priorities. This study explores factors of interest in understanding public views on four marine NETs, both perceptions of climate severity and urgency, and beliefs about marine environments. It uses a quantitative survey to explore how a representative sample of people in British Columbia, Canada and Washington state, United States evaluate four marine NETs: coastal restoration; ocean alkalinity enhancement; ocean fertilization; and offshore direct air carbon capture and storage. We find that perceived severity and urgency of climate change predicts greater comfort with all NETs studied, and views of marine environments as adaptable, fragile and manageable vary in predicting both greater and lesser comfort. Drawing upon these insights, the paper offers reflections on the conditional thinking linked with emerging views of marine NETs, concluding with methodological suggestions for future research on public perceptions as concerns the deployment of ocean-based CDR near and long term. Incorporating these insights into policy for ocean-based CDR will be important to ensuring responsible governance of these technologies. Key policy insights Incorporating research on public perceptions will be important to the design of marine NETs and accompanying policies. Public groups in both British Columbia and Washington expressed high levels of comfort with coastal restoration, some comfort with offshore direct air carbon capture and storage, and some discomfort with ocean alkalinity enhancement and ocean fertilization. Perceived severity and urgency of climate change predicted greater comfort with all approaches; this evidence aligns with a small but growing body of scholarship indicating openness to environmental intervention amongst public groups concerned with climate impacts. Beliefs about marine environments, namely whether they are 'adaptable', 'manageable' or 'fragile', also predicted comfort, suggesting that CDR in ocean contexts requires further examination regarding public perceptions.

Public perceptions of carbon dioxide removal in the United States and the United Kingdom

Behavioural frameworks to understand public perceptions of and risk response to carbon dioxide removal

Public perception of carbon dioxide removal in three Asian regions

Public perceptions on carbon removal from focus groups in 22 countries

Public evaluations of four approaches to ocean-based carbon dioxide removal

The public use of early-stage scientific advances in carbon dioxide removal: a science-technology-policy-media perspective

Searching for a Public in Controversies over Carbon Dioxide Removal: An Issue Mapping Study on BECCS and Afforestation

The carbon dioxide removal gap

The International Politics of Carbon Dioxide Removal: Pathways to Cooperative Global Governance

Lay person perceptions of marine carbon dioxide removal (CDR) – Working paper

Carbon dioxide removal technologies are not born equal

Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy in the Making: Assessing Developments in 9 OECD Cases

The impact of regional resources and technology availability on carbon dioxide removal potential in the United States

Key uncertainties behind global projections of direct air capture deployment

Carbon dioxide removal: A source of ambition or of delays? Examining expectations for CDR in Swiss climate policy

European Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy: Current Status and Future Opportunities

A review of commercialisation mechanisms for carbon dioxide removal

Assessing Capacity to Deploy Direct Air Capture Technology at the Country Level – An Expert and Information Entropy Comparative Analysis

Delaying carbon dioxide removal in the European Union puts climate targets at risk

The Oxymoron of Carbon Dioxide Removal: Escaping Carbon Lock-In and yet Perpetuating the Fossil Status Quo?

Taking stock of carbon dioxide removal policy in emerging economies: developments in Brazil, China, and India