Fostering the social license to operate: An integrative framework of organizational antecedents
Sofiane Baba,Naoko Mercier,Andrée-Anne Guesthier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104538
IF: 8.222
2024-01-02
Resources Policy
Abstract:Projects are omnipresent in society (Burke and Morley, 2016; Lundin et al., 2015), shaping what some now term a "projectified society" (Lundin et al., 2015). In fact, we are constantly building infrastructure and developing new neighborhoods, regularly organizing significant events such as the Olympics, and continuously exploiting natural resources—sometimes extravagant ways. Importantly, within an evolving business landscape and a globally connected world, power dynamics are propelled by the rise of the information society (Déry et al., 2015), and this shift has substantial implications for projects. They are now more than ever subject to comprehensive social evaluations involving a multitude of stakeholders (Black, 2013; Saenz, 2018). These stakeholders typically possess diverse expectations, interests, and aspirations, exerting critical pressure on the project proponent. This pressure becomes pivotal for project success, particularly within dynamic and evolving environments (Helmig et al., 2016) and when projects are visible and have long-term focus (Dare et al., 2014). Consequently, cultivating a social license to operate (SLO), signifying stakeholder approval of a project or its ongoing activities, has become a vital dimension for all projects, especially those with pronounced social and environmental impacts within specific territories (Baba et al., 2022; Kânoğlu-Özkan and Soytaş, 2022). The SLO concept holds paramount importance for all types of projects, encompassing both large and small projects, whether in the private or public domain, ranging from infrastructure development to the extraction of natural resources (Baba and Dahan, 2023). When a project faces controversy or lacks public approval, its social dynamics can cascade into significant repercussions, swiftly taking on a political dimension (Facal and Thibault, 2022). The SLO, originally rooted in the extractive industry, and predominantly utilized in environmental-related controversies involving natural resources, now extends beyond these origins. This concept implies a paradigm shift in the economic landscape, challenging the traditional notion of imposing projects in a top-down manner onto communities and stakeholders. The concept of SLO symbolizes stakeholders' growing aspirations to be meaningfully involved in every project that influences their lives. In this article, beyond the definitional debate about what SLO is and is not (e.g., Gehman et al., 2017), and how it can be measured or not, we adhere to the definition of Cui et al. (2016, p. 775), who suggest that a SLO refers to " a community's acceptance or approval of a specific company project or of the entire company's ongoing operations in the community." Akin to many buzzwords, SLO has sparked a plethora of literature over the past two decades, solidifying its position as a critical success factor of projects across various sectors (Thomas et al., 2019). Our comprehension of this concept has significantly progressed over the years. Noteworthy contributions have illuminated aspects such as the determinants of failure and success in projects (Bhowmik et al., 2018; Ceglarz et al., 2017), the importance of engaging local communities (Caprar et al., 2022), local communities' mobilizations and resistances against projects (Borch et al., 2018; Fraune and Knodt, 2018; Voyer et al., 2015), and various forms and strategies for stakeholder engagement (Furmankiewicz et al., 2021; Solman et al., 2021). Additionally, there is a clearer understanding of the definitional boundaries of the concept and the collaborative process between project proponents and local stakeholders throughout the project's life cycle (Mercer-Mapstone et al., 2018). An interesting conceptual contribution in this regard is offered by Dare et al. (2014, p. 189), who argue that "social licence is often erroneously conceived as a single licence [whereas] it needs to be understood as a continuum of multiple licences achieved across various groups within society." Despite the valuable insights contributed thus far, SLO remains within the realm of pre-paradigmatic research (Kuhn, 1962)—an area lacking well-defined epistemological underpinnings and cohesive theoretical integration. This can be ascribed to the multidisciplinary nature of the literature, spanning diverse domains such as business and management, environmental studies, philosophy, law, sociology, and urban studies. Notably, many authors have presented their work with a pronounced disciplinary orientation, often with limited attempts at interdisciplinary integration. Unfortunately, this approach perpetuates increased fragmentation within the field. Also, various discipines have typically focused on different units of analysis, encompassing communities, businesses, projects, technologies, society, law, and political instruments. Certain authors have explored specific stand-alone units of analysis, while others -Abstract Truncated-
environmental studies