Abstract:What is the role of political representation by ethnic parties in a multi-ethnic state that has undergone a transition from military rule, and is seeking to resolve protracted intrastate conflicts? The present article examines this question through a contextual case study of ethnic parties in Myanmar – a state that is characterised by unresolved ethnic grievances and conflicts; a political transition that has created new opportunities for ethnic representation; and multiple ethnic parties making representative claims on behalf of ethnic groups. Based on a mixed methods approach, the article documents that ethnic parties have been relatively ineffective in ensuring formal and descriptive representation and have had limited possibilities for substantive representation of ethnic interests. The article also identifies key explanations for the weak electoral performance of ethnic parties, emphasising party fragmentation and vote-splitting as well as weak party institutionalisation and limited capacity to make representative claims. Finally, the article analyses strategies for party-building, in preparation for the 2020 election. Based on the common emphasis on vote-splitting, most ethnic states have seen initiatives to merge parties, while a few parties have also sought to develop their political platform and sector policies. The article concludes that ethnic parties may gain improved formal representation after the next election but questions about the parties’ capacity for substantive representation remains. The 2020 election will thus be a new test for how ethnic voters see themselves best represented, in the light of competing representative claims and past experiences: by ethnic parties or non-ethnic democracy parties?

The politics of legal pluralism in the shaping of spatial power in Myanmar’s land governance

Breaking with the past? The politics of land restitution and the limits to restitutive justice in Myanmar

Are the Odds of Justice “Stacked” Against Them? Challenges and Opportunities for Securing Land Claims by Smallholder Farmers in Myanmar

“Hybrid Governance” and the Politics of Legitimacy in the Myanmar Peace Process

Rule of Law Expedited: Land Title Reform and Justice in Burma (Myanmar)

After the Rice Frontier: Producing State and Ethnic Territory in Northwest Myanmar

Frontier Governance: Contested and plural authorities in a Karen village after the ceasefire

Border Governance: Reframing political transition in Myanmar

Institutional Reform in Myanmar: Preventing Corporate Land Rights Abuses

Political Representation by Ethnic Parties? Electoral Performance and Party-Building Processes among Ethnic Parties in Myanmar

Sustainable Development Under Competing Claims on Land: Three Pathways Between Land-Use Changes, Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being

Negotiating Social Norms and Relations in the Micromobilization of Human Rights: The Case of Burmese Lesbian Activism

The Pat Jasan drug eradication social movement in Northern Myanmar, part three: Legal pluralism & the challenge of everyday justice

Political transition and emergent forest-conservation issues in Myanmar

The Space Between Us: Questioning Multi-Spatial Justice in the Upcoming Indonesia’s Capital

“It doesn’t matter at all—we are family”: Titling and joint property rights in Myanmar

Gender gaps in land rights: Explaining different measures and why households differ in Myanmar

Global justice, national education and local realities in Myanmar: a civil society perspective

The birth of Buddhist politics of religious freedom in Myanmar

Ethnonationalism and Cultural Heritage Law in Myanmar

Legal Pluralism in the Governance of Transitional China