Abstract:Public lands including forests and community pastures are still crucial means of local livelihood, social security, and environmental conservation in many developing countries including Nepal. However, these resources are increasingly managed primarily to offset greenhouse gas emissions of developed countries. The new management has exacerbated many local problems: livelihood constriction, social crises, human casualties (deaths and serious injuries), biodiversity degradation, and water scarcity including cryosphere retreating. Drawing data from multiple sources, this study attempted to explain the international political objectives and processes that dispossessed developing societies of public land resources for the benefit of developed countries. It shows that representatives of the developed countries were proactively and strategically involved in agenda formation, solutions negotiations, and decision-making while developing international environmental policies, and succeeded to structure the policies for managing the resources of developing countries for the best benefit of their own countries. The developed countries provided funds and experts, as strategic tools, through international aid agencies to implement the policies of their interest in institutionally weak countries. In Nepal, the aid agencies influenced the thinking of the public and the decisions of the government and other stakeholders through a series of strategic measures. They propagandized false crises, worked with a coalition of powerful international agencies, offered free technical support, and changed national policies proactively to manage the land resources for achieving their missions. Active involvement in policy implementation also helped the agencies to monitor implementation hurdles and apply other tactics to resolve them. Lucrative flash incentives were provided to motivate and get the support of communities, powerful stakeholders, and politicians to implement the policies. Psychosocial pressures were also applied to persuade local communities and their leaders for getting local cooperation in making and practicing new legal institutions (government authority rules or orders, user group rules, and forest management plans) that bind and control local communities for forest protection. The institutions obliged local communities to contribute free labor or cash for developing, modifying, and protecting the forests. These two levels of interventions led to the further development of reinforcing institutions, resource conditions, and social-ecological systems that secured benefits for developed countries and deprived local communities of power to control, produce and access the public land resources in their own backyard for years. This study also showed that international environmental policies and aid agencies have respectively served as institutional weapons and vehicles for materially and institutionally powerful countries to colonize the land resources of weaker countries, without using of physical coercion or deplyment of military forces.

Sustainable Development Under Competing Claims on Land: Three Pathways Between Land-Use Changes, Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being

The Suitability and Sustainability of Governance Structures in Land Consolidation under Institutional Change: A Comparative Case Study

How Can Diverse National Food and Land-Use Priorities Be Reconciled with Global Sustainability Targets? Lessons from the FABLE Initiative

Impact of land use land cover change on ecosystem services: a comparative analysis on observed data and people’s perception in Inle Lake, Myanmar

Designing mosaic landscapes for sustainable outcome: Evaluating land-use options on ecosystem service provisioning in southwestern Ghana

Place-based Interpretation of the Sustainable Development Goals for the Land-River Interface

Ontological politics of hydrosocial territories in the Salween River basin, Myanmar/Burma

Placed-based interpretation of the sustainable development goals for the land-river interface

Participatory analysis of sustainable land and water management practices for integrated rural development in Myanmar

Agricultural land use and the sustainability of social-ecological systems

Participatory Mapping of Ethnoecological Perspectives on Land Degradation Neutrality in Southern Burkina Faso

Examining Trajectories of Change for Prosperous Forest Landscapes in Cambodia

Landscape management strategies for multifunctionality and social equity

Ecosystem services and trade-offs: implications for land dynamics and sustainable livelihoods in Northern Lombok, Indonesia

International environmental policy processes that dispossessed developing societies of public land resources: A case study of Nepal

Breaking with the past? The politics of land restitution and the limits to restitutive justice in Myanmar

“Saving the Forest” with a REDD+ Project: Socio-Ecological Repercussions on Indigenous People in Cambodia

The politics of legal pluralism in the shaping of spatial power in Myanmar’s land governance

Are the Odds of Justice “Stacked” Against Them? Challenges and Opportunities for Securing Land Claims by Smallholder Farmers in Myanmar

The Socio-political Issues of Land Management

How to measure the impact of landsenses ecology on sustainable development? A review of people-oriented emerging approaches