Abstract:Introduction In mental health prevention, person-centered, and rights-based approaches, the role of recovery is highlighted (WHO, 2021). Various evaluation tools are used in rehabilitation objectives and programs, including the Specific Levels of Functioning Scale (SLOF) (Mucci et al. Schizophr Res 2014;159 144-50) and the Recovery Assessment Scale – Domains and Stages (RAS-DS), a self-measure of mental health recovery. It includes 38 items clustered into four recovery domains and meets two functions. In addition to measuring self-reported outcomes, it increases service-user control towards objectives and recovery action plans (Honey et al. BMC Psychiatry 2023;23 500). Objectives To evalue the efficacy of RAD-DS in a psychiatric rehabilitation facility to be used as a routine tool in daily rehabilitation activity. Methods In our observational study, we recruited 103 inpatients (total: 103 patients, females: 38 patients, males: 65 patients) in a psychiatric rehabilitation facility. The patient presented with psychiatric disorders that met the diagnostic criteria of DMS-5 (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, MDD, personality borderline disorder). Epidemiological data are shown in Table 1. All patients were undergoing a psychiatric rehabilitation program and were observed during a one-year evaluation. In all patients, the following rating scales were administered at baseline (T0) and after a year (T1): For the evaluation of social measures, life outcomes, and functioning and recovery: - Recovery Assessment Scale – Domains and Stages RAS-DS - Specific Levels of Functioning Scale (SLOF) - Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) For psychopathological evaluation: - Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) The data were statistically analyzed with the EZAnalyze 3.0 software for the Excel platform. Results The RAS-DS total score results (Table 2) show a not significant difference between T0 vs. T1 (mean: 101.80 vs. 104.37, p. 0.193). An improvement in the score was observed after one year of rehabilitation treatment in the subgroup "Doing things I value" (T0 vs. T1: mean 16.15 vs. 18.77, p 0.001). Statistically significant differences were observed in the subgroups "Mastering my illness" (T0 vs. T1: mean 18.3 vs. 20.85, p. 0.021). In the other subgroups, the differences were not statistically significant. Interestingly, these results are comparable to those found with SLOF and GAF (respectively, p. 0.972 and p. 0.873). Image: Image 2: Conclusions The current trend of research and clinical practice is to give more importance to psychiatric rehabilitation treatment (Franza Psychiatr Danub 2022;34(Suppl 8) 9-13). The results obtained with our observational study indicate the possible usefulness of indicators of patient well-being, as well as the RAS-DS in the management of psychiatric rehabilitation programs. The expectations, indications, and perceptions of psychiatric patients can be decisive in improving recovery. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Psychometric Properties of a Fidelity Scale for Illness Management and Recovery

Initial Validation of an Ecological Momentary Assessment Measure of Self-Efficacy to Manage Negative Emotions

The Family Psychoeducation Fidelity Scale: Psychometric Properties

The inter-rater reliability and construct validity of the Functional Independence Measure for multiple sclerosis subjects

Development and initial testing of the self‐care of chronic illness inventory

Assessment of the psychometrics of a PROMIS item bank: self-efficacy for managing daily activities

Preliminary evaluation of a questionnaire for assessing fidelity of early intervention for psychosis services

The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure

Fidelity, acceptability, and feasibility of the revised functional autonomy measurement system for hospitalised people: An implementation study

Awareness and perceptions of managing recovery in psychiatric patients in a rehabilitation center: an observational study

Measurement properties of the Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale

Italian adaptation and psychometric validation of the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) and its modified versions in adults with multiple sclerosis: a Rasch analysis study

Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Staff Perceptions of Recovery Climate and Culture in Mental Health Programs

Validating a tool to measure spiritual beliefs, needs and resources in serious illness: The I‐SPIRIT

The Partners in Health scale: The development and psychometric properties of a generic assessment scale for chronic condition self-management

Optimizing Measurement Potential in Mental Health Clinical Practice: The Canadian Personal Recovery Outcome Measure (C-PROM) study

Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the FACIT-Sp-12: Assessing Spiritual Well-Being Among Patients with Chronic Diseases

Reliability and validity of the Patient Experiences Questionnaire for Interdisciplinary Treatment for Substance Dependence – Continuous Electronic Measurement (PEQ-ITSD – CEM)

Feasibility of Recovery Assessment Scale – Domains and Stages (RAS-DS) for everyday mental health practice

Psychometric properties of the PROMIS-57 questionnaire, Norwegian version

Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures