Abstract:Background Care complexity can occur when patients experience health challenges simultaneously with social barriers including food and/or housing insecurity, lack of transportation or other factors that impact care and patient outcomes. People with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may experience care complexity due to the chronicity of their condition and other biopsychosocial factors. There are few standardised instruments that measure care complexity and none that measure care complexity specifically in people with RA. Objectives We assessed the content validity of the INTERMEDS Self‐Assessment (IMSA) instrument that measures care complexity with a sample of adults with RA and rheumatology healthcare providers (HCPs). Cognitive debriefing interviews utilising a reparative framework were conducted. Methods Patient participants were recruited through two existing studies where participants agreed to be contacted about future studies. Study information was also shared through email blasts, posters and brochures at rheumatology clinic sites and trusted arthritis websites. Various rheumatology HCPs were recruited through email blasts, and divisional emails and announcements. Interviews were conducted with nine patients living with RA and five rheumatology HCPs. Results Three main reparative themes were identified: (1) Lack of item clarity and standardisation including problems with item phrasing, inconsistency of the items and/or answer sets and noninclusive language; (2) item barrelling, where items asked about more than one issue, but only allowed a single answer choice; and (3) timeframes presented in the item or answer choices were either too long or too short, and did not fit the lived experiences of patients. Items predicting future healthcare needs were difficult to answer due to the episodic and fluctuating nature of RA. Conclusions Despite international use of the IMSA to measure care complexity, patients with RA and rheumatology HCPs in our setting perceived that it did not have content validity for use in RA and that revision for use in this population under a reparative framework was unfeasible. Future instrument development requires an iterative cognitive debriefing and repair process with the population of interest in the early stages to ensure content validity and comprehension. Patient or Public Contribution Patient and public contributions included both patient partners on the study team and people with RA who participated in the study. Patient partners were involved in study design, analysis and interpretation of the findings and manuscript preparation. Data analysis was structured according to emergent themes of the data that were grounded in patient perspectives and experiences.

The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure

The Partners in Health scale: The development and psychometric properties of a generic assessment scale for chronic condition self-management

Validation of Psychometric Properties of Partners in Health Scale for Heart Failure

Assessing Disease Self-Management in Multi-Ethnic Patients with Chronic Conditions and Evaluating Psychometric Properties of the Partners in Health Scale

Translation and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Partners in Health Scale

Development and Validation of the Chronic Condition Physician-Patient Relationship Scale (CC-PPR): A patient-informed measurement tool.

Development and preliminary validation of the chronic hepatitis B self-management scale

A shared journey: evaluating a patient-assessed measure of self-management of chronic conditions in an Australian setting

The structural and convergent validity of three commonly used measures of self-management in persons with neurological conditions

The reliabililty and consistency of health literacy scale for chronic patients

Development and initial testing of the self‐care of chronic illness inventory

The Patient-Perceived Helpfulness of Measures Scale: Development and Validation of a Scale to Assess the Helpfulness of Using Measures in Psychological Treatment

Development and initial validation of the chronic hepatitis B quality of life instrument (CHBQOL) among Chinese patients

Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Self-efficacy and Self-management in People With Coronary Heart Disease

Content validity testing of the INTERMED Self‐Assessment in a sample of adults with rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatology healthcare providers

Development and Validation of a COPD Self-Management Scale

Reliability and validity on the knowledge, attitude and behavior scale in cancer patients with PICC

The Perceived Medical Condition Self-Management Scale Applied to Persons with HIV/AIDS

Development and validation of the Cancer Patients PICC Self-management Scale

Validation of the shortened Perceived Medical Condition Self-Management Scale in patients with chronic disease.