Abstract:SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, Volume 10, Issue 2 , Page 394-429, January 2019. In the existing literature of robust utility maximization with ambiguity, agents are generally assumed to be extremely ambiguity-averse as they tend to only consider expected payoffs in the worst-case scenario. However, experimental studies have shown that agents' attitude to ambiguity is not systematically negative and can even be ambiguity-seeking when they consider themselves knowledgeable or competent. To conceptually distinguish between an agent's perception of ambiguity and ambiguity aversion, the so-called $\alpha$-maxmin expected utility ($\alpha$-MEU) was proposed in the economics literature as a linear aggregation of the most and least favorable prior beliefs. Although the axiomatic characterization of $\alpha$-MEU has been well studied, there has been little work on the benchmark maximization problem for $\alpha$-MEU. The main difficulty stems from the dynamic inconsistency of two distinct extreme priors and nonconvexity (and nonconcavity) of the value function. In this paper, we study the maximization problem for $\alpha$-MEU and solve for the equilibrium strategies of open-loop type. Under logarithmic risk preference, we obtain the explicit form of equilibrium investment strategies, which involves a two-dimensional system of fully coupled quadratic backward stochastic differential equations (BSDE). The main challenge in completing the verification theorem is to study the existence, uniqueness, and stability of this system of BSDE. For this purpose, we consider a general Markov model of the financial market, which leads to a system of quadratic Markovian BSDE. We find that the equilibrium investment strategy becomes more conservative if the agent is more ambiguity-averse or the agent perceives more ambiguity in the financial market. The equilibrium strategy is close to the classical nonrobust strategy (without ambiguity) if the agent is ambiguity-neutral. As time approaches maturity, ambiguity-seeking (ambiguity-averse) agents adopt more aggressive (conservative) equilibrium strategies. Additionally, the equilibrium strategy of an ambiguity-neutral agent converges to the classical nonrobust strategy at maturity.

Dynamically consistent alpha‐maxmin expected utility

Dynamically Consistent α-Maxmin Expected Utility

Equilibrium Strategies for Alpha-Maxmin Expected Utility Maximization

Maximum Score Estimation of Preference Parameters for a Binary Choice Model under Uncertainty

Robust Utility Maximization with Extremely Ambiguity-Loving and Ambiguity-Aversion Preferences

Robust Decision Making Using a General Utility Set

STABILITY OF THE EXPONENTIAL UTILITY MAXIMIZATION PROBLEM WITH RESPECT TO PREFERENCES

Utility Maximization, Risk Aversion, and Stochastic Dominance

Cost-efficient payoffs under model ambiguity

A Stochastic Optimal Control for Max-Min Utility with Volatility Ambiguity

Ambiguity, Risk, and Asset Returns in Continuous Time

A Minimax Portfolio Selection Strategy with Equilibrium.

On Utility Maximisation Under Model Uncertainty in Discrete-Time Markets

Optimal Stopping under Model Ambiguity: a Time-Consistent Equilibrium Approach

Ambiguous volatility and asset pricing in continuous time

Robust Utility Maximizing Strategies under Model Uncertainty and their Convergence

Aversion to ambiguity and model misspecification in dynamic stochastic environments

A Continuous-Time Asset Pricing Model with Smooth Ambiguity Preferences

Alpha-Robust Mean-Variance Reinsurance-Investment Strategy

Time-Consistency of Optimal Investment under Smooth Ambiguity

Optimal Insurance under Maxmin Expected Utility