Abstract:SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, Volume 10, Issue 2 , Page 394-429, January 2019. In the existing literature of robust utility maximization with ambiguity, agents are generally assumed to be extremely ambiguity-averse as they tend to only consider expected payoffs in the worst-case scenario. However, experimental studies have shown that agents' attitude to ambiguity is not systematically negative and can even be ambiguity-seeking when they consider themselves knowledgeable or competent. To conceptually distinguish between an agent's perception of ambiguity and ambiguity aversion, the so-called $\alpha$-maxmin expected utility ($\alpha$-MEU) was proposed in the economics literature as a linear aggregation of the most and least favorable prior beliefs. Although the axiomatic characterization of $\alpha$-MEU has been well studied, there has been little work on the benchmark maximization problem for $\alpha$-MEU. The main difficulty stems from the dynamic inconsistency of two distinct extreme priors and nonconvexity (and nonconcavity) of the value function. In this paper, we study the maximization problem for $\alpha$-MEU and solve for the equilibrium strategies of open-loop type. Under logarithmic risk preference, we obtain the explicit form of equilibrium investment strategies, which involves a two-dimensional system of fully coupled quadratic backward stochastic differential equations (BSDE). The main challenge in completing the verification theorem is to study the existence, uniqueness, and stability of this system of BSDE. For this purpose, we consider a general Markov model of the financial market, which leads to a system of quadratic Markovian BSDE. We find that the equilibrium investment strategy becomes more conservative if the agent is more ambiguity-averse or the agent perceives more ambiguity in the financial market. The equilibrium strategy is close to the classical nonrobust strategy (without ambiguity) if the agent is ambiguity-neutral. As time approaches maturity, ambiguity-seeking (ambiguity-averse) agents adopt more aggressive (conservative) equilibrium strategies. Additionally, the equilibrium strategy of an ambiguity-neutral agent converges to the classical nonrobust strategy at maturity.

A Minimax Portfolio Selection Strategy with Equilibrium.

Portfolio selection under possibilistic mean-variance utility and a SMO algorithm

Robust General Equilibrium under Stochastic Volatility Model

Equilibrium Strategies for Alpha-Maxmin Expected Utility Maximization

Equilibrium portfolio selection under beliefs-dependent utilities

Robust Equilibrium Strategy for Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection

Multi-Objective Portfolio Selection Considering Expected and Total Utility

Robust equilibrium strategy for mean-variance-skewness portfolio selection problem

An uncertain bi-objective mean-entropy model for portfolio selection with realistic factors

A new multi-objective portfolio optimization model based on dual expected utility

A minimax regret approach for robust multi-objective portfolio selection problems with ellipsoidal uncertainty sets

Sparse portfolio selection with uncertain probability distribution

Portfolio Optimization Model with Transaction Costs

Robust Portfolio Selection with Distributional Uncertainty and Integer Constraints

Equilibrium Portfolio Selection for Smooth Ambiguity Preferences

On Utility Maximisation Under Model Uncertainty in Discrete-Time Markets

Dynamically consistent alpha‐maxmin expected utility

A Model for Portfolio Selection with Order of Expected Returns.

An Empirical Study on Discrete Optimization Models for Portfolio Selection

On utility maximization in discrete-time financial market models

Multiple-factor optimistic value based model and parameter estimation for uncertain portfolio optimization