Japan's ban on China's Huawei continues domino effect

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/oxan-es240467

2018-12-10

Abstract:Headline JAPAN: Ban on China's Huawei continues domino effect

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Opposition to China's Huawei will grow among US allies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/oxan-db240591

2018-12-14

Abstract:Subject The impacts of the arrest of Huawei's CFO in Canada. Significance Meng Wanzhou, chief financial officer (CFO) of Chinese telecoms equipment maker Huawei, was arrested while transiting at Vancouver airport on December 1, and faces extradition to the United States on charges related to Huawei’s alleged violations of US sanctions against Iran. This arrest will have serious consequences for Huawei's global operations and for China's relations with the United States and Canada. Impacts The case will encourage third countries to move away from Huawei components -- if they can afford to. Overseas suppliers and customers too may decide that the political risk of relying on Huawei is too high. This case will advance the 'de-coupling' of the Chinese and US technology sectors.
Non-decision decisions in the Huawei 5G dilemma: Policy in Japan, the UK, and Germany

Alanna Krolikowski,Todd H. Hall

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s146810992200038x

2023-02-11

Japanese Journal of Political Science

Abstract:Huawei, the telecommunications company based in the People's Republic of China (PRC), has presented the governments of several middle powers with a policy dilemma. On the one hand, Huawei's affordable 5G network technology is attractive to telecommunications operators in these countries, which do not have domestic producers of this equipment. On the other hand, the U.S. government and intelligence agencies in other countries maintain that Huawei gear presents intolerable network security risks, a charge that the PRC government and Huawei forcefully reject as they insist Huawei merits access to foreign markets. Facing the question of whether and how to allow the installation of Huawei's 5G equipment in their domestic networks, the governments of Japan, the United Kingdom, and Germany have been caught between the competing demands of the two rivalrous superpowers and faced internal divisions among communities of government experts. At first glance, Japan, the UK, and Germany each appear to have responded to the Huawei dilemma in a different way. The Japanese government moved quickly and without formal announcement to exclude Huawei from its market, while publicly denying a ban. The UK government initially allowed Huawei to supply some of its national 5G infrastructure, but then reversed itself to ban the company's equipment outright after a U.S. regulatory change. The German government has yet to officially ban Huawei, but has taken successive steps to curtail the PRC company's continued involvement in its domestic networks. In spite of their apparent differences, the three national responses to the Huawei dilemma share a fundamental commonality: all amount to 'non-decision decisions' on the question of whether and how to allow Huawei to supply domestic 5G networks. In one way or another, each government avoided making policy decisions that were either explicit, definitive, or singular on the issue, but nonetheless reduced the likelihood of Huawei's participation in its domestic 5G infrastructure. After developing the concept of a 'non-decision decision,' we explain why these maneuvers are not isolated responses to a specific policy conundrum, but may presage a mode of middle power coping with competing demands from two increasingly rivalrous superpowers.

political science
The effect of the ongoing China-US trade war on Huawei, evidence from 2021 financial report

Liping Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58837/chula.is.2021.19

Abstract:In Jan of 2018, the U.S. had waged a trade war against China. Besides additional tariffs on Chinese products, in May of 2019, the USA is also tightening restrictions on the transfer of technology to China and the business activities of Huawei, namely the chip ban. For many companies, being sanctioned by the U.S. would be a devastating blow, a crisis that could potentially ruin the entire business. This paper has used the data from Huawei's 10-year annual report and attempted to find out Huawei's current situation after 4 years sanctions from the financial point of view. The author expects that this study will be helpful in conducting further study in the areas of the U.S. sanctions on high-tech companies outside America.

Business,Economics
Decoupling from China: how U.S. Asian allies responded to the Huawei ban

Ji-Young Lee,Eugeniu Han,Keren Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2021.2016611

2022-01-04

Australian Journal Of International Affairs

Abstract:As the U.S.-China strategic rivalry has intensified, Washington has looked to its close allies and partners to counter Chinese clout in global technology leadership. With the Huawei ban as a proxy for the U.S.-China competition, the paper focuses on the concept of the alliance halo and analyzes how the three key U.S. allies in Asia—Australia, Japan, and South Korea—responded to Washington’s expectations of mutual support on the decoupling of Chinese technology companies from global supply chains. We argue that given that the Huawei ban is about future risks associated with China’s economy, as opposed to demonstrated military threats, it was more challenging to establish allied reliability within the U.S. alliance network as a whole. Our comparative analysis shows that Australia’s reactions have been the most direct, banning Huawei before the United States, showing a contrast with South Korea’s relatively muted responses. Japan’s decision to ban Huawei was as decisive as Australia’s but Tokyo sought to keep a low profile. Rather than the diplomatic pressure from the Trump administration, these allies’ varied responses resulted from their own assessments of security risks associated with Huawei.
UK looks at impact of US sanctions on Huawei cooperation

Yeni Şafak

2020-06-21

Abstract:The United Kingdom is looking carefully at any impact the United States' new sanctions on Huawei mig

Political Science
China’s Globalizing Internet: History, Power, and Governance

Yu Hong,Eric Harwit

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2020.1722903

IF: 3.698

2020-01-01

Chinese Journal of Communication

Abstract:The specter of global digital China looms large in foreign policy debates around the world. Political headlines fuel a polarizing sentiment. The ongoing US–China trade dispute, in particular, has s...
China’s Counter-Strategy to American Export Controls in Integrated Circuits

Douglas B. Fuller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3798291

2021-03-01

Abstract:This article examines China’s efforts to counter American sanctions against Huawei that in effect try to weaponize the silicon supply chain. While China has taken tentative steps to try to decouple from the American semiconductor industry, it faces three continuing challenges. First, the areas of technological dependence that the Huawei Entity List sanctions highlighted, fabrication capital equipment and electronic design automation (EDA) software, are areas in which China has very weak capabilities. Second, the wider the scope of the sanctions is, the more likely local and foreign firms will be willing to cooperate with Chinese efforts to create substitutes for controlled American technologies. But the scope of the sanctions appears to be in stasis and may even narrow during the Biden administration. Finally, the progressive expansion of China’s silicon ambitions has elicited foreign industrial policies to counter China’s own policies. This expanding market outside of China will lessen the effectiveness of Chinese policy and at the same time make a certain level of controls over IC technology palatable to American partners as Chinese customers are replaced by others.

Engineering,Political Science,Business,Economics
Construction of Huawei’s Image in News Reports: Take China Daily and The New York Times for Example

Kuizi Ma,Ya Xiao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n4p1

2020-04-11

International Journal of English Linguistics

Abstract:In recent years, as China’s largest smartphone company, Huawei’s position in the international market has gradually increased and received widespread attention from foreign media. The rapid development of China’s impact on the hegemony of the US has also changed the direction of US media’s reporting on Chinese companies. At this stage, it is meaningful to study the image of Huawei in both Chinese and US media reports. Therefore, based on the corpus approach and critical discourse analysis, this paper builds two corpora of China Daily (576 reports with 438,261 words) and The New York Times (429 reports with 347,025 words). It is found that (1) both sides acknowledge that Huawei ranks top in world telecommunication technology, particularly in the 5G network; (2) two newspapers focus on different aspects in their reports. For the Chinese media, Huawei’s technological prowess, innovation capacity in the global market, cooperation with many other European and African countries are given more attention, while for the American media, more focus is shifted to Huawei’s threat to national security; (3) two newspapers hold different attitudes towards the rise of Huawei. China Daily’s positive construction of Huawei’s image is obvious. While for the American media, the Trump administration is more likely to project a threatening image of Huawei; (4) the reporting frameworks and the styles of materials selected differ in two newspapers. China Daily’s framework concentrates on “Huawei” itself, while The New York Times tends to construct a reporting framework from multiple perspectives from the third-party.
Chip Semiconductors: The Development Trend of Global Supply Chain and the Challenges Faced by China

Zhihui Ni,Zirui Wu

Abstract:. Japan, the United States, China and other countries have different chip development histories. With cooperation and competition in the process of development, different countries explore and research into different sub sectors, and ultimately occupy an important part of the global chip industry chain. In recent years, China’s chip semiconductor industry has shown an upward trend. After years of precipitation, Huawei has come to the fore, occupying a key link in the world’s semiconductor industry chain and becoming an integral part of it. However, countries led by the United States have gradually begun to put pressure on China to limit the development of China’s chip semiconductor industry. From the perspective of the global chip semiconductor industry chain, this paper under-stands the development process of chips and analyzes the challenges faced by China today.

Engineering,Economics,Business
Huawei Is Quietly Dominating China’s Semiconductor Supply Chain

Antonia Hmaidi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2024.123.s1.68

2024-10-01

Current History

Abstract:Huawei is emerging as the leader of China’s national team in semiconductors, dominating chip manufacturing and seeking to integrate the country’s entire supply chain. Its ambitions stem from both its placement on the U.S. Entity List and strong government support at the national and local level. Internationally, Huawei is coy about these ambitions, hiding its supply chain involvement and often operating under a different company’s name. Meanwhile, Huawei’s experience is also encouraging other Chinese technology companies to support China’s quest for chip self-sufficiency, developing new hardware and software for that purpose. The clandestine nature of Huawei’s involvement—it is not known who serves what role in semiconductor production—makes it more difficult for Western companies and governments to assess China’s progress in technology, vet potential partners and customers, and conduct risk assessments.

political science,international relations
The Impact of US-China Trade Friction on China's High-Tech Sector

Ke Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/86/20240933

2024-05-28

Abstract:The main axis of the US-China game deepens from Trump's trade war to Biden's tech wars. At the same time, the chip industry has gradually become the main battlefield for the United States to suppress and curb China's scientific and technological fields. Whereas chips are an essential part of modern military equipment, communications facilities, nuclear power plants, transport systems and other critical infrastructure. Early mastery of the core chip technology can be early not to be constrained by others, to avoid the risk of being "necked".This paper will analyse the reasons why China makes the US feel that its national security is threatened, the impact of the US-China trade friction on China's science and technology sector, and find out the measures that China can take to deal with the US sanctions related to the science and technology sector, as well as the right way for China to get along with the US.
Does Huawei React Well to the US Sanction in the Aspect of Finance?

Lide Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/82ne3

2020-07-06

Abstract:Huawei has suffered a heavy toll on sales in international markets because of the US sanction, but it has successfully utilized its strength and opportunity, meaning having use sales promotion, patriotism and proprietary technology in promotions in the domestic market, and having switched and secured its suppliers. Therefore, the sales in the Chinese mainland is quite satisfactory to Huawei, and this situation let Huawei achieve an increase in sales revenue. In addition, the impact of the US sanction on Huawei's liquidity and profitability is minimum. Therefore, financially speaking, Huawei reacted well to the US sanction.
Le développement de l’Internet chinois sur la scène mondiale

Yu Hong,Eric Harwit,Maurice Hérion

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/syll.cetri.2021.01.0053

2021-01-01

Abstract:L’Internet chinois bouleverse l’ordre mondial de la communication. Encadré par le « Great Firewall » et contrôlé étroitement par l’État, le plus grand cyberespace géolinguistique et national du monde est aussi dominé par des entreprises et financé par des capitaux transnationaux. Pouvoirs publics et plateformes collaborent dès lors à remodeler la mondialisation, mais sont confrontés à des clivages motivationnels et stratégiques.
Huawei: A Case Study on a Telecom Giant on the Rise

Michelle Haveman,Jeroen Vochteloo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23012-2_5

2016-01-01

Abstract:For many years, Huawei was only an Original Design Manufacturer (ODM), which means that the company only developed and designed mobile phones for other manufactures. In 2011, the company switched its vision and also decided to produce mobile phones under their own name. Furthermore, since 2012, Huawei is rushing to the European market. Its vision is to become one of the top three world smartphone brands. The focus of Huawei is on continuous innovation that is customer-centric and improving customer service quality. Huawei is also the third largest applicant for patents in the world. The company is capable of offering innovative products for a cheaper price, sometimes even more than 25 % cheaper than similar products of its competitor. Africa’s mobile technology progression would not have been as far as it is now without Huawei and its cheaper products. The success of Huawei could also be due to the help that Huawei is accused of receiving from the Chinese government. However, this could also be something that is stopping Huawei from entering markets, as Huawei could represent a national security threat.
China-Japan cooperation rests on shaky foundations

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/oxan-db239849

2018-11-13

Abstract:Subject China-Japan relations. Significance A raft of new bilateral cooperation initiatives is underway following Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's recent visit to China, where he held his first bilateral summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping since the two leaders took office in 2012. Impacts Tokyo views the US relationship as the most important and will avoid anything that would elicit a backlash from Trump. Relations in many areas are back to wary cooperation, as before the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands dispute flared up in 2010. Confrontation between ships in disputed waters will continue, keeping the potential for another crisis alive.
Recovering from geopolitical risk: An event study of Huawei’s semiconductor supply chain

Ying Kei Tse,Kyra Dong,Ruiqing Sun,Rober Mason

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109347

IF: 11.251

2024-07-01

International Journal of Production Economics

Abstract:Amidst the ongoing globalisation of supply chains, geopolitical issues have emerged as a significant source of supply chain risk for firms. This has recently been illustrated in the trade sanctions adopted by the US against the Chinese semiconductor industry, particularly in the accessing of semiconductor chips. A notable event here, that we focus on in this paper, involves how the leading telecommunications company Huawei has been impacted by this and most interestingly how they have been able to respond, by being able to successfully launch new chip-based products during the US semiconductor chip technology blockade, despite the sanctions ban. This has been achieved with the support of key supplier, SMIC, who has become a major 7 nm chip supplier for Huawei. Employing the event study research method, this study initially examines the stock market's response to Huawei's new product release with these new SMIC-sourced semiconductor chips. It also appraises the propagation effects on Huawei's and SMIC's supply chain partners. This exposes the differential impact on the supply chain members of Huawei (focal firm) and SMIC (main supplier). The results reveal predominantly positive responses from Huawei's suppliers and customers, as well as SMIC's suppliers and customers, to these incidents, with Huawei's suppliers' and SMIC's suppliers' and customers' share prices responding positively to the release of Huawei's new product, exhibiting substantial median stock market reaction of 1.53%, 1.62%, and 2.52% on Day 0, respectively, it shows, in contrast, that Huawei's customers did not exhibit a positive share price reaction to the development of this newly sourced product. It is noteworthy that SMIC's supply of chips to Huawei has had a significantly positive impact on both Huawei and SMIC's suppliers and customers. With the impact varying across different roles within the supply chains, this study provides useful insights for understanding the propagation effect of good news in the supply chain resulting from firms' proactive action in response to imposed sanctions for a key supply component.

engineering, manufacturing, industrial,operations research & management science
Recovering from geopolitical risk: An event study of Huawei's semiconductor supply chain

Ying Kei Tse,Kyra Dong,Ruiqing Sun,Robert Mason

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4765332

IF: 11.251

2024-07-25

International Journal of Production Economics

Abstract:Amidst the ongoing globalisation of supply chains, geopolitical issues have emerged as a significant source of supply chain risk for firms. This has recently been illustrated in the trade sanctions adopted by the US against the Chinese semiconductor industry, particularly in the accessing of semiconductor chips. A notable event here, that we focus on in this paper, involves how the leading telecommunications company Huawei has been impacted by this and most interestingly how they have been able to respond, by being able to successfully launch new chip-based products during the US semiconductor chip technology blockade, despite the sanctions ban. This has been achieved with the support of key supplier, SMIC, who has become a major 7nm chip supplier for Huawei. Employing the event study research method, this study initially examines the stock market's response to Huawei's new product release with these new SMIC-sourced semiconductor chips. It also appraises the propagation effects on Huawei's and SMIC's supply chain partners. This exposes the differential impact on the supply chain members of Huawei (focal firm) and SMIC (main supplier). The results reveal predominantly positive responses from Huawei's suppliers and customers, as well as SMIC's suppliers and customers, to these incidents, with Huawei's suppliers' and SMIC's suppliers' and customers' share prices responding positively to the release of Huawei's new product, exhibiting substantial median stock market reaction of 1.53%, 1.62%, and 2.52% on Day 0, respectively, it shows, in contrast, that Huawei's customers did not exhibit a positive share price reaction to the development of this newly sourced product. It is noteworthy that SMIC's supply of chips to Huawei has had a significantly positive impact on both Huawei and SMIC's suppliers and customers. With the impact varying across different roles within the supply chains, this study provides useful insights for understanding the propagation effect of good news in the supply chain resulting from firms' proactive action in response to imposed sanctions for a key supply component.

engineering, industrial,operations research & management science, manufacturing
The Depoliticization of Law in the News: BBC Reporting on US Use of Extraterritorial or 'Long-Arm' Law Against China

Le Cheng,Xiaobin Zhu,David Machin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2102519

IF: 1.642

2023-01-01

Critical Discourse Studies

Abstract:In this paper we explore how a public national media outlet, the British BBC, represents an international legal case which has a highly political nature. The case is US versus Huawei/Meng Wanzhou, which took place between 2018 and 2021. Accusations were that the Chinese technology company committed fraud, leading the global HSBC bank to breach US sanctions against Iran. The charges were made by the US using what is called an 'extraterritorial law', which, while rejected as law by governments around the world, is policed by US economic powers and control over international finance. Using Critical Discourse Analysis we show that, while the BBC presents much detail of legal process, the actual nature of the law the US uses to bring criminal charges against international companies and banks, is neither considered nor questioned. Our interest is how such a law, which has a huge influence over global trade and politics, is presented to the public in this particular case. We contribute to the position that the nature of laws, how they are used and known, must always be understood within the prevailing discourses of the moment.
Geostrategy and Great Power Relations: A Reanalysis of the Basic Trends of Sino-Japanese Relations

Feng Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s2737557922500061

2022-06-01

East Asian Affairs

Abstract:Since the outbreak of COVID-19, China and Japan have fought against the epidemic through high-level contacts, donation and so on. The Chinese proverb “mountains and rivers on foreign land, wind and moon under the same sky” gave warmth of friendship to the bilateral relations. However, since Yoshihide Suga won the election, the Sino-Japanese relations have taken a worsening turn. The current Prime Minister Fumio Kishida further takes counterbalancing China as top priority. The “anti-COVID-19 diplomacy” in 2020 had very limited improvement on Sino-Japanese relations. It is clear that since the implementation of the U.S. strategic competition policy against China, Japan, without hesitation, turns to the “national interest theory” and “international contribution theory” by positioning to counterbalance China. Japan has become one of the few Asian countries that have completely sided with US in the China–US strategic competition. Since the normalization of Sino-Japanese relations, the principle of “good-neighborhood” has been totally replaced by the seemingly determined approach of “counterbalance” proposed by Japanese politicians. Japan has gone beyond the issue of its neighboring areas, trying to assist the United States’ strategic containment of China, which has added a new variable to China’s neighboring diplomacy.
China and Japan: Facing History

Nancy Snow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyac020

2022-01-01

Social Science Japan Journal

Abstract:Global pandemic realities of the last couple of years have not improved the ability of China and Japan to face history on sober, non-zero-sum terms. This is not to say that bilateral relations were entirely on the up-and-up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic was first documented in China; but in the six months before ‘Wuhan virus’ entered the lexicon, at the time when Vogel released China and Japan, the two rivals were facing each other more in person than they had in a quarter of a century. Person-to-person contact was at an all-time high. Record numbers of Chinese were visiting Japan and placing it at the top of their revisit list. Record numbers of Chinese students were attending Waseda, Tokyo, and other leading Japan universities, and the ratio of Chinese to Americans studying abroad in Japan was 40:1, thanks in part to the devaluing of the yen through Abenomics. Vogel was able to end this, his final book, on a note of optimism and hope that fifteen hundred years of interpersonal ties could triumph over residual strained relations.

Japan's ban on China's Huawei continues domino effect

Opposition to China's Huawei will grow among US allies

Non-decision decisions in the Huawei 5G dilemma: Policy in Japan, the UK, and Germany

The effect of the ongoing China-US trade war on Huawei, evidence from 2021 financial report

Decoupling from China: how U.S. Asian allies responded to the Huawei ban

UK looks at impact of US sanctions on Huawei cooperation

China’s Globalizing Internet: History, Power, and Governance

China’s Counter-Strategy to American Export Controls in Integrated Circuits

Construction of Huawei’s Image in News Reports: Take China Daily and The New York Times for Example

Chip Semiconductors: The Development Trend of Global Supply Chain and the Challenges Faced by China

Huawei Is Quietly Dominating China’s Semiconductor Supply Chain

The Impact of US-China Trade Friction on China's High-Tech Sector

Does Huawei React Well to the US Sanction in the Aspect of Finance?

Le développement de l’Internet chinois sur la scène mondiale

Huawei: A Case Study on a Telecom Giant on the Rise

China-Japan cooperation rests on shaky foundations

Recovering from geopolitical risk: An event study of Huawei’s semiconductor supply chain

Recovering from geopolitical risk: An event study of Huawei's semiconductor supply chain

The Depoliticization of Law in the News: BBC Reporting on US Use of Extraterritorial or 'Long-Arm' Law Against China

Geostrategy and Great Power Relations: A Reanalysis of the Basic Trends of Sino-Japanese Relations

China and Japan: Facing History