Abstract:The ideas and results that are in the background of the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics had an immense impact on our understanding of reality. Therefore, it is crucial that these implications reach also the general public, not only the scientists in the related fields of quantum mechanics. The purpose of this review is to attempt to elucidate these revolutionary changes in our worldview that were eventually acknowledged also by the Nobel's committee, and to do it with very few references to mathematical details (which could be even ignored without undermining the take-away essence of the text). We first look into the foundational disputes between Einstein and Bohr about the nature of quantum mechanics, which culminated in the so-called EPR paradox -- the main impetus for all the research that would ensue in this context. Next, we try to explain the statement of the famous Bell's theorem -- the theorem that relocated the Einstain-Bohr discussions from the realm of philosophy and metaphysics to hard-core physics verifiable by experiments (we also give a brief derivation of the theorem's proof). Then we overview the experimental work of the last year's laureates, that had the final say about who was right in the debate. The outcome of these experiments forced us to profoundly revise our understanding of the universe. Finally, we discuss in more detail the implications of such outcomes, and what are the possible ways that our worldviews can be modified to account for the experimental facts. As we will see, the standard mechanist picture of the universe is no longer a viable option, and can be never again. Nowadays, we know this with certainty unusual for physics, that only a strict mathematical theorem could provide.

Analysis for Science Librarians of the 2019 Nobel Prize in Physics: From Cosmic Scales to Nearby Stars

Profiles of James Peebles, Michel Mayor, and Didier Queloz: 2019 Nobel Laureates in Physics

2020 Nobel Prize for Physics: Black holes and the Milky Way's darkest secret

Hubble's Nobel Prize

The Nobel prizes in physics for astrophysics and gravitation and the Nobel prize for black holes: Past, present, and future

Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: a bibliometric analysis of Nominees and Winners of the Chemistry and Physics Prizes (1901-2007)

Complex systems in the spotlight: next steps after the 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics

2022 Nobel Prize in Physics and the End of Mechanistic Materialism

Statistical analysis of the laureates of the Nobel Prize in Physics

Unveiling Fate of the Universe Through Observations of Type Ia Supernovae - Brief Introduction to the Nobel Prize in Physics 2011

Citation network centrality: a scientific awards predictor?

The Laureates of the Nobel Prize in Physics 2022. Some personal memories

Understanding and Building Upon Pioneering Work of Nobel Prize in Physics 2021 Laureates Syukuro Manabe and Klaus Hasselmann: from Greenhouse Effect to Earth System Science and Beyond

Preprint: Institutional Value of a Nobel Prize

David Charbonneau and Sara Seager win Kavli Prize

Verification of the anecdote about Edwin Hubble and the Nobel Prize

The Nobel Prize in Physics 1999

How can revivals of scientific publications be explained using bibliometric methods? A case study discovering booster papers for the 1985 Physics Nobel Prize paper

Places of ‘Invention and Discovery’ and the Nobel Prize in Physics

Work honored by Nobel prizes clusters heavily in a few scientific fields