Founder Leaders and Organization Culture: A Comparative Study on Indian and American Founder Leaders Based on Schein’s Model of Organizational Culture

Mamatha S.V.,Geetanjali P.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975219890932

2020-01-01

Abstract:Organizational culture is created gradually by founder leaders on the basis of their values, assumptions and beliefs. Organizational culture is tangible in terms of the architecture of the company, office layout and exhibits and intangible in terms of behaviour of employees, decisions, policies and procedures. This article aims to perform a comparative analysis of some of the founder leaders of Indian and American businesses and their influence on the culture of the organization. The study adopts the case method research design where the focus is on the specific interesting cases, articles and interviews of the founder(s) in their formational years and cases when the company had a stable organizational culture. The unit of analysis is the founder leader. The company’s culture is evaluated using Schein’s Model of Organizational Culture while that of the founder leader is evaluated using Hofstede’s model of cultural dimensions. This study does not equate national culture to individual’s culture to avoid ecological fallacy of interpreting country-level relationships being applied to individuals. The study shows that there exist layers of subcultures in each individual. The article discusses an interesting paradigm, that is, the culture in which they are born/trained and the culture they adopt intentionally. When founders adopt other cultures, some traces of adopted cultures are reflected in the organization. The article concludes that founder leaders’ culture needs a better framework in order to see its effects on the organization. Hofstede’s model does not show the relationship between different layers of the culture. Hence, the model seems inadequate to be applied to analyse founder leaders.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve are as follows:

1. **The relevance between the individual cultural orientation of founder - leaders and the organizational culture of their companies**: The paper explores how the personal cultural orientation of founder - leaders affects the culture of their organizations. Specifically, the research focuses on how the basic assumptions and value systems of founders are related to their organizational cultures.

2. **The deficiencies of existing models in analyzing individual cultural orientation**: The paper points out that existing cultural models (such as Hofstede's cultural dimension theory and Schein's organizational culture model) have deficiencies when applied to analyze individual cultural orientation and need further improvement and refinement. In particular, Hofstede's model fails to fully explain the relationships between different cultural levels, while Schein's model focuses more on cultural dissemination at the organizational level.

3. **Differences in the influence of founder - leaders in a cross - cultural context**: By comparing founder - leaders in India and the United States, the paper explores how founder - leaders in different cultural contexts shape their organizational cultures. The research aims to reveal the impact of East - West cultural differences on founder - leaders and their organizational cultures.

### Research methods and case selection

To explore the above - mentioned problems, the paper adopts the case - study method and selects two representative cases for analysis:

- **Steve Jobs**: One of the co - founders of Apple Inc., representing the Western cultural context.
- **Narayan Murthy**: One of the founders of Infosys Limited, representing the Eastern cultural context.

### Main conclusions

1. **Power Distance**: Narayan Murthy's low - power - distance belief (that is, emphasizing employee participation and mutual benefit) is related to his middle - class family background and growth environment, which is reflected in his empowerment and trust of employees. In contrast, Steve Jobs' high - power - distance belief (that is, centralized decision - making and strict control) may be related to his personal character and growth experience.

2. **Long - Term Orientation (LTO)**: Narayan Murthy emphasizes the sustainable development of the company and employee welfare, which is reflected in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) he promotes and the transparent corporate culture. Steve Jobs, on the other hand, focuses more on product innovation and quality, which reflects his pursuit of perfectionism and his strategic planning for the long - term development of the company.

3. **Specific manifestations of organizational culture**: Narayan Murthy's organizational culture emphasizes integrity, transparency and fairness, which are closely related to his personal values and social responsibility. Steve Jobs' organizational culture focuses more on product design and user experience, which reflects his attention to details and his pursuit of excellence.

### Significance and contributions

This research not only fills the gap in the existing literature on the impact of the individual cultural orientation of founder - leaders on their organizational cultures, but also provides a cross - cultural perspective to help understand how founder - leaders in different cultural contexts shape their organizational cultures. In addition, the research results have important practical significance for enterprise management and organizational culture construction, and help enterprises better understand and deal with cultural differences in the context of globalization.