Abstract:Purpose - The purpose of the study is to investigate what values are now important to young American and Chinese managers, since they profile the direction in which their country is headed. It aims to explore if the ethical values of young executives in different countries are converging to a common global business culture. It also aims to argue that the individualism-collectivism value dimension by itself does not capture the differences between the Chinese and American sample members. The vertical-horizontal dimension, in contrast, seems to better delineate the value orientations among young executives in the two countries. Design/methodology/approach - In this two-phase study, both attitudinal and scenario-based measurements are applied to assess the strength of work value orientations among similar subjects in China and the USA. Findings - In study 1, Chinese respondents score significantly higher on a hierarchical-vertical dimension than do the Americans, although the two groups do not differ significantly on the collectivism-individualism dimension. In study 2, which entails resolving an ethical dilemma, the American subjects apply Egalitarianism as their most frequent expressed value, reflecting their horizontal perspective. The Chinese subjects, in contrast, rely strongly on a traditional vertical value system to resolve the ethical dilemma. Although both American and Chinese negotiators show a collectivist as well as an individualist. orientation, their focuses are fundamentally different. Originality/value - The well-established collectivism/individualism cultural dimension has been heavily used in cross-cultural studies, sometimes without much discretion. This study was undertaken as a preliminary attempt to outline the cultural patterns observed among young managers in America and China. The paper argues that cross-cultural differences underlying ethical conflicts should not be reduced to the single value dimension of individualism/collectivism.

Comparison on Chinese and American Corporate Cultures Based on the Cross-cultural Management Theory

A Comparison Between the Cultural Statements of Chinese and United States Companies

Cross-Cultural Differences In Conflict Management An Inductive Study Of Chinese And American Managers

A theoretical comparison of US and Chinese culture and implications for human resource theory and practice

On the Differences of Management Culture Between the West and the Orient

A Comparison of the Key Elements Between Chinese Corporate Culture and South Korean Corporate Culture

Comparison between Chinese Traditional Culture and Modern Management Theory

Study on the Difference between China and the U.S.Indicator System from Cultural Background

Comparative Study of Cultural Value Orientation between China and America

Corporate Political Action in China and America: a Comparative Perspective

Organizational Culture in China: an Analysis of Culture Dimensions and Culture Types

The Difference and Synergy of Chinese and European Management Culture

Unity in Difference: A Comparison of the Value Between China and USA

A comparative analysis of corporate social responsibility development in the USA and China

The Evolution of Business Ethics in China and the United States: Convergence, Divergence, or Crossvergence?

Analysis current situation of corporation culture in tech-economics era

Confucianism, socialism, and capitalism: A comparison of cultural ideologies and implied managerial philosophies and practices in the P. R. China

Cross-cultural Research on the Management of China's and South Korea's Enterprises

A Comparative Study of Chinese and American Corporate Image Construction from the Perspective of Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory － Taking Huawei and Apple as Examples

A cross-cultural investigation of work values among young executives in China and the USA

The Leadership Style Of Comparison Research Of China And Germany