Influence of environmental conditions on extracellular and intracellular antibiotic resistance genes in manure‐amended soil: A microcosm study

Chad W. McKinney,Robert S. Dungan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20049
IF: 2.9
2020-05-01
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Abstract:The objectives of this study were to modify the protocol of a commercial DNA extraction kit to sequentially extract extracellular DNA (eDNA) and intracellular DNA (iDNA) from the same soil sample and to determine the effects of temperature (5, 20, and 35 °C), water holding capacity (25, 50, and 75% of maximum water holding capacity), and freeze‐thaw (−20/20 °C) on the abundance of two antibiotic resistance genes [sul1 and tet(M)], a class 1 integron‐integrase gene (intI1), and a 16S rRNA gene in soils treated with dairy manure. To assess the efficiency of the eDNA/iDNA method, we performed spiking and recovery experiments with a gene that codes for a green fluorescent protein (gfp). When soils were spiked with a whole‐cell preparation of gfp‐containing Escherichia coli, the recovery of the gfp gene was on average 0.2 and 1.2% for eDNA and iDNA, respectively. Soils were also spiked with the gfp gene itself, which showed that nearly 80% of the DNA could not be recovered. Results from the microcosm experiments indicate that extracellular and intracellular sul1, tet(X), intI1, and 16S rRNA genes are resilient and not readily affected by changes in soil moisture and temperature. The intracellular gene levels decreased only slightly during the 56‐d incubation period, whereas the extracellular gene levels decreased dramatically by Day 7 and leveled off thereafter. Absolute gene abundances were one to two orders of magnitude higher in iDNA than in eDNA fractions but were similar when normalized to the 16S rRNA gene throughout the incubation period, indicating that enrichment of extracellular and intracellular antibiotic resistance genes did not occur.
soil science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?