[Application of reverse traction device in preoperative treatment of high-energy tibial plateau fracture]
Mingli Chen,Zonglin Chen,Honghan Li,Jinhong Chen,Hongpeng Gao,Miao Huang,Guanqi Xue,Zepeng Lin,Rongyuan Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202404004
2024-07-15
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of the reverse traction device in the preoperative treatment of high-energy tibial plateau fractures. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 33 patients with high-energy tibial plateau fractures who met the selection criteria between December 2020 and December 2023. All patients were treated by open reduction and internal fixation. According to the preoperative traction method, they were divided into the observation group (16 cases, treated with a reverse traction device on the day of admission) and the control group (17 cases, treated with heel traction on the day of admission). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, affected side, cause of injury, fracture Schatzker classification between the two groups ( P>0.05). Preoperative waiting time, preoperative related complications (nail channel loosening, nail channel oozing, nail channel infection, soft tissue necrosis, soft tissue infection, deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity, etc.), operation time, and total hospitalization time were recorded and compared between the two groups. On the 4th day after traction, visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the pain relief of the patients, the swelling value of the affected limb was measured, and the Immobilization Comfort Questionnaire (ICQ) score was used to evaluate the perioperative hospital comfort of the patients. Results: Both groups of patients completed the operation successfully, and the operation time, total hospitalization time, and preoperative waiting time of the observation group were significantly less than those of the control group ( P<0.05). There was no preoperative related complications in the observation group; in the control group, 3 patients had nail channel loosening and oozing, and 2 cases had the deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity; the difference in the incidence of complication between the two groups was significant ( P<0.05). On the 4th day after traction, the ICQ score, VAS score, and limb swelling value of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group ( P<0.05). X-ray films showed that the tibial plateau fracture separation and lower limb alignment recovered after calcaneal traction in the control group, but not as obvious as in the observation group. The fracture gap in the observation group significantly reduced, the tibial plateau alignment was good, and the lateral angulation deformity was corrected. Conclusion: The use of reverse traction treatment in patients with high-energy tibial plateau fractures on admission can accelerate the swelling around the soft tissues to subside, reduce patients' pain, shorten the preoperative waiting time, improve the patients' preoperative quality of life, and contribute to the shortening of the operation time, with a good effectiveness.