Abstract:Objective: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) internal fixation for treating unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures (UIFF). Methods: In this retrospective study, the clinical data of 86 patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures (IFF) treated in Hangzhou Fuyang Hospital of Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2022 to December 2023 were collected and analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their treatment modality: the THA group (n=45, treated with THA) and the PFNA group (n=41, treated with PFNA internal fixation). The two groups were compared in terms of surgery-related indicators (operative time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency), postoperative recovery indicators (time to first ambulation, length of stay, time until full weight-bearing ambulation), and the incidence of postoperative complications. The pain indicators (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale) and hip joint function indicators (Harris Hip Scores) of patients in the two groups were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. The hip joint function recovery outcomes of the two groups of patients were recorded at the last follow-up. Results: The PFNA group had significantly shorter operative time, shorter incision length, lower intraoperative blood loss, lower postoperative drainage volume, and higher intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency compared to the THA group (all P < 0.05). The PFNA group also had significantly longer time to first ambulation, length of stay, and time until full weight-bearing ambulation (all P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative Wong-Baker scores in both groups decreased compared to preoperative levels. At 1 and 3 months postoperatively, the PFNA group had significantly higher Wong-Baker scores than the THA group (P < 0.05), but at 6 months postoperatively, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Postoperative Harris scores increased in both groups compared to preoperative scores. At 1 month postoperatively, the PFNA group had significantly lower Harris scores than the THA group (P < 0.05); however, at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the differences were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the rates of excellent recovery of hip joint function between the two groups at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both THA and PFNA internal fixation yield favorable outcomes in treating IFF with no significant difference in complications. The difference lies in the shorter operative time and lesser trauma inflicted by PFNA internal fixation, despite it involving prolonged radiation exposure and bed rest. Conversely, THA requires longer operative time and causes greater trauma but results in shorter postoperative recovery periods, allowing earlier ambulation.

Influence on surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with or without preoperative skeletal traction

Double reverse traction repositor versus traction table for the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture: A comparative Study

Is Preoperative Traction for Proximal Femoral Fractures Beneficial to the Patient or a Comfort to the Doctor?

Clinical study on surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in patients with Parkinson disease

Comparison of Percutaneous Compression Plating and Short Reconstruction Nail for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture

[Application of reverse traction device in preoperative treatment of high-energy tibial plateau fracture]

A retrospective study of open reduction and traction bed-assisted closed reduction intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fracture

[Surgical technique and effect of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation internal fixation assisted with large retractor for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures]

Percutaneous Compression Plating Versus Short Reconstruction Nail for the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures

Short-term efficacy of the proximal femoral nail antirotation systemversus intertrochanteric antegrade nail system in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture

The Influence of Anesthesia on the Postoperative Recovery Eldly Patients with Intertrochanteric Facture of Femur

What is the Fracture Displacement Influence to Fracture Non-Union in Intramedullary Nail Treatment in Subtrochanteric Fracture?

Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures with Percutaneous Non-Contact Bridging Plates

[Minimal invasion and closed reduction with external fixation for elderly femoral intertrochanteric fracture].

The Treatment Strategies of Intertrochanteric Fractures Nonunion: an Experience of 23 Nonunion Patients.

Fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nailing: Supine position with traction table versus lateral decubitus position

Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of hip arthroplasty and proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures

[Curative effect analysis on closed reduction and external fixator under local anesthesia for the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients with high-risk]

[Influence of integration of fracture treatment and exercise rehabilitation on effectiveness in patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur]

[Comparison of PFNA and InterTAN Intramedullary Nail in Treating Unstable Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures].

Clinical outcomes of three treatments for intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients