Abstract:In order to optimize the structure and improve the performance of the head and face protective equipment for an individual soldier, firstly, the blast wave resistance tests of the bare-head model were carried out in real explosion field and shock tube environments, respectively. On this basis, the forward and lateral blast shockwave protective performance tests for helmet-head systems with different structures and protection levels were carried out by using the shock tube method. Finally, the peak values and durations of shockwave overpressure in the front, forehead, top, back, ear and eye areas of the helmet-head systems were compared and analyzed. The experimental results show that the blast shockwave test using a shock tube can be a substitute for the real explosion field test. When subjected to the effect of frontal shock wave, the peak value of the shockwave overpressure measured at the top measuring point of the two-half-helmet head model is about 1/6 compared with that of the nozzle outlet and 1/3 of the bare-head model as well as the integrated-helmet head model. The shockwave splits and relieves pressure at the split structure on the top of the two-half helmets and forms a superimposed reflection, resulting in a prolonged action time (5.5−8.5 ms), but a significantly decreased peak overpressure. For the rear measuring points, the peak overpressure (365 kPa) of shockwave measured by the integrated-helmet head model is slightly higher than that (303 kPa) measured by the two-half-helmet head model, and about 2.5 times as high as that (148 kPa) measured by the bare head model. By improving the structural airtightness of individual head and face protective equipments (such as wearing glasses, earmuffs or protective masks), shockwaves can be effectively prevented from entering the helmet-head systems, the stacking convergence effect can be weakened, and the protective performance of individual head and face equipments can be improved.

Primary blast wave protection in combat helmet design: A historical comparison between present day and World War I

Investigation into helmet–head shock wave interactions at low overpressures through free-field blasts and schlieren imagery

Experimental and numerical study on the protective mechanism of the full helmet subjected to blast loadings

Ballistic Helmets: Recent Advances in Materials, Protection Mechanisms, Performance, and Head Injury Mitigation

In Silico Investigation of Intracranial Blast Mitigation with Relevance to Military Traumatic Brain Injury

The Effect of Shock Wave on a Human Head

Experimental investigation of a viscoelastic liner to reduce under helmet overpressures and shock wave reflections

Research on anti-shockwave performance of the protective equipment for the head of a soldier based on shock tube evaluation

Biomechanical Assessment Of Brain Dynamic Responses Due To Blast-Induced Wave Propagation

Protective Mechanism of Helmet Under Far-field Shock Wave

Design of Mechanics‐Guided Helmet Pad and Its Protection Performance Against the Blast Shock Waves

Characterization of viscoelastic materials for low-magnitude blast mitigation

Analyzing the Contribution of Helmet Components to Underwash Effect under Blast Load

Incorporating neck biomechanics in helmet testing: Evaluation of commercially available WaveCel helmets

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Combat Eyewear Protection Against Blast Overpressure

Skull Flexure from Blast Waves: A Mechanism for Brain Injury with Implications for Helmet Design

Testing the shock protection performance of Type I construction helmets using impactors of different masses

Improving TBI Protection Measures and Standards for Combat Helmets

Padded Helmet Shell Covers in American Football: A Comprehensive Laboratory Evaluation with Preliminary On-Field Findings

Impact test comparisons of 20th and 21st century American football helmets

Toward reducing impact induced brain injury: Lessons from a computational study of army and football helmet pads