Initial Assessment of the Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation System in Patients on Mechanical Ventilation

James O’Rourke,Michal Soták,Gerard F. Curley,Aoife Doolan,Tomáš Henlín,Gerard Mullins,Tomáš Tyll,William Omlie,Marco V. Ranieri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000004256
IF: 8.8
2020-05-01
Critical Care Medicine
Abstract:<span><span class="ej-keyword">Mechanical ventilation</span> is one of the most common interventions for patients admitted to ICUs with up to 40% of patients requiring this means of ventilatory support (<sup><a class="ejp-citation-link js-ejp-citation-link">1</a></sup>). The number of patients requiring prolonged acute <span class="ej-keyword">mechanical ventilation</span> is increasing and is expected to exceed 1 million patients in 2020 in the United States at a cost of more than $64 billion (<sup><a class="ejp-citation-link js-ejp-citation-link">2</a></sup>). The time required to wean patients from <span class="ej-keyword">mechanical ventilation</span> is proportional to ICU length of stay with 45% of ICU patients experiencing difficult or prolonged weaning (<sup><a class="ejp-citation-link js-ejp-citation-link">3</a></sup>). Extended time on ventilatory support also increases patient morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs (<sup><a class="ejp-citation-link js-ejp-citation-link">4</a></sup>).</span>
critical care medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?