Abstract:Background Patients with sepsis and immobility in the intensive care unit are associated with muscle weakness, and early mobilisation can counteract it. However, during septic shock, mobilisation is often delayed due to the severity of the illness. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be an alternative to mobilise these patients early. This study aims to identify whether NMES performed within the first 72 hours of septic shock diagnosis or later is safe from a metabolic perspective. Methods This is the analysis of two randomised controlled crossover studies. Patients with acute septic shock (within the first 72 hours of diagnosis) and sepsis and septic shock in the late phase (after 72 hours of diagnosis) were eligible. Patients were submitted in a random order to the intervention protocol (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised and NMES) and control (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised without NMES). The patients were allocated in group 1 (intervention and control) or group 2 (control and intervention) with a wash-out period of 4 to 6 hours. Metabolic variables were evaluated by indirect calorimetry. Results Sixteen patients were analysed in the acute septic shock study and 21 in the late sepsis/septic shock study. There were no significant differences between Oxygen Consumption (VO 2 ) values in the acute phase of septic shock when the baseline period, intervention, and control protocols were compared (186.59 ± 46.10; 183.64 ± 41.39; 188.97 ± 44.88, p>0.05- expressed in mL/Kg/min). The same was observed when the VO 2 values in the late phase were compared (224.22 ± 53.09; 226.20 ± 49.64; 226.79 ± 58.25, p>0.05). The other metabolic variables followed the same pattern, with no significant differences between the protocols. When metabolic variables were compared between acute to late phase, significant differences were observed (p<0.05). Conclusions As metabolic rates in septic shock patients had no increase during NMES, either in the first 72 hours of diagnosis or later, NMES can be considered safe from a metabolic viewpoint, even despite the higher metabolic demand in the acute phase of shock. Trial registration NCT03193164 ; NCT03815994 . Registered on June 5, 2017; November 13, 2018 (clinicaltrials.gov/).

The use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) in patients admitted to Intensive Care Units: A bibliographic review

Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in critically ill adults with mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the recovery of people with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit: A narrative review

Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Peripheral Muscle Strength and Exercise Tolerance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Systematic Review

Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of the Quadriceps and Diaphragm in Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Study

Prevention of Muscle Atrophy in ICU Patients Without Nerve Injury by Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation: a Randomized Controlled Study

Safety and Feasibility of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

20 years of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in COPD

Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Critical Illness Neuromyopathy and the Role of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Patients

Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with early rehabilitation therapy on mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective randomized controlled study

Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial

Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in COPD Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Improves Muscle Strength, Biomechanics of Movement, and Functional Mobility in Children With Chronic Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial

Using Physiological Markers to Assess Comfort during Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Induced Muscle Contraction in a Virtually Guided Environment: Pilot Study for a Path toward Combating ICU-Acquired Weakness

Current Concepts in Early Mobilization of Critically Ill Patients Within the Context of Neurologic Pathology

A preliminary study on the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulatıon in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

The effect of electrical stimulation in critical patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation in the ICU: Moving Back to the Future

Effects of NMES pulse width and intensity on muscle mechanical output and oxygen extraction in able-bodied and paraplegic individuals