Breath-by-breath comparison of a novel percutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation approach with mechanical ventilation in juvenile pigs: a pilot study

Matthias Manfred Deininger,Dmitrij Ziles,Annegret Borleis,Teresa Seemann,Fabian Erlenkoetter,Christian Bleilevens,Arnhold Lohse,Carl-Friedrich Benner,Steffen Leonhardt,Marian Walter,Thomas Breuer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61103-5

IF: 4.6

2024-05-06

Scientific Reports

Abstract:About one in three critically ill patients requires mechanical ventilation (MV). Prolonged MV, however, results in diaphragmatic weakness, which itself is associated with delayed weaning and increased mortality. Inducing active diaphragmatic contraction via electrical phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) not only provides the potential to reduce diaphragmatic muscular atrophy but also generates physiological-like ventilation and therefore offers a promising alternative to MV. Reasons why PNS is not yet used in critical care medicine are high procedural invasiveness, insufficient evidence, and lack of side-by-side comparison to MV. This study aims to establish a minimal-invasive percutaneous, bilateral electrode placement approach for sole PNS breathing and thereby enable, for the first time, a breath-by-breath comparison to MV. Six juvenile German Landrace pigs received general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation. Following the novel ultrasound-guided, landmark-based, 4-step approach, two echogenic needles per phrenic nerve were successfully placed. Stimulation effectiveness was evaluated measuring tidal volume, diaphragmatic thickening and tomographic electrical impedance in a breath-by-breath comparison to MV. Following sufficient bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation in all pigs, PNS breaths showed a 2.2-fold increase in diaphragmatic thickening. It induced tidal volumes in the lung-protective range by negative pressure inspiration and improved dorso-caudal regional ventilation in contrast to MV. Our study demonstrated the feasibility of a novel ultrasound-guided, percutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation approach, which generated sufficient tidal volumes and showed more resemblance to physiological breathing than MV in a breath-by-breath comparison.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to solve the problem of diaphragmatic muscle weakness caused by the long - term use of mechanical ventilation (MV) in critically ill patients. Specifically, although mechanical ventilation is crucial for preventing hypoxemia and treating respiratory failure, it causes disuse atrophy of the diaphragm through non - physiological positive - pressure ventilation, which in turn leads to problems such as delayed weaning and increased mortality.

To meet this challenge, researchers have proposed a new method: inducing active diaphragmatic contractions through phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS). This method not only helps reduce diaphragmatic muscle atrophy but also generates a more physiologically - similar ventilation pattern, thus providing a promising alternative to mechanical ventilation.

However, PNS has not been widely used in critical care medicine mainly for the following reasons:

1. **High invasiveness**: Traditional PNS methods usually require surgical implantation of electrodes.
2. **Insufficient evidence**: There is a lack of sufficient clinical evidence to support its effectiveness and safety.
3. **Lack of direct comparison**: There has been no direct breath - by - breath comparison with mechanical ventilation.

Therefore, the main objectives of this study are:

1. **To establish a minimally invasive percutaneous bilateral electrode placement method** for PNS ventilation alone.
2. **To achieve the first breath - by - breath comparison between PNS and mechanical ventilation** to evaluate the effectiveness and superiority of PNS.

Through the achievement of these objectives, the study hopes to demonstrate the feasibility and advantages of PNS as a potentially more physiologically - similar ventilation method.

### Specific research questions

- **How to achieve PNS through minimally invasive methods**: The study has developed a four - step method under ultrasound guidance for accurate placement of stimulation electrodes.
- **Can PNS generate lung - protecting tidal volumes**: The effectiveness of PNS is verified by measuring tidal volume, diaphragmatic thickening, and tomographic conductivity.
- **How does the PNS ventilation pattern differ from that of mechanical ventilation**: In particular, attention is paid to the performance of PNS in improving ventilation in the dorsal and caudal regions.

By answering these questions, the study aims to provide important scientific basis and technical support for the future application of PNS in critical care.