Abstract:Purpose: The impact of moral beliefs on individuals' moral judgments, particularly within the framework of contrasting cultural values such as collectivism and individualism, continues to be a subject of interest. This research delves into whether individuals with distinct values display differences in moral beliefs, with a specific focus on selflessness. Methods: Through experiment 1 and 2, we scrutinize the moral judgments of individuals with diverse values concerning pro-social behaviors driven by selflessness and in-group favoritism. Experiment 3 investigates the underlying mechanisms by examining reward expectations. Results: The findings from experiments 1 and 2 indicate that collectivists exhibit significantly higher moral judgment levels for selfless pro-social behaviors compared to individualists, highlighting a disparity in moral beliefs between the two value systems. Experimental 2 also found that collectivists' moral judgments rose and fell as rescuers' selflessness increased or decreased. However, individualist moral judgment did not change significantly with behavioral selflessness. The results reveal that collectivists hold higher reward expectations for selfless behavior, which contributes to their heightened moral judgment of selfless behavior. Conclusion: While it may be assumed that collectivists' moral beliefs would be dominated by in-group preferences, aligning with the conceptual in-group preference of collectivism, this study unexpectedly found evidence of collectivists' pursuit of selflessness in their moral beliefs. These findings offer initial evidence of distinct patterns of moral beliefs associated with collectivism and individualism, shedding light on potential reasons that lead collectivists to possess stronger moral beliefs about selflessness.

Everyone should get the same, but we should get more: Group entitlement and intergroup moral double standard

Morality, Social Inclusion, and In-Group Superiority: The Differential Role of Individualizing and Binding Foundations in Perceptions of the Social Identity of In-Group and Out-Group Members

'(N)One of us but all of them!' Ingroup favouritism on individual and group levels in the context of deviant behaviour

Unveiling Unexpected Selfless Collectivism: Exploring Variances in Moral Beliefs Across Cultural Values

Perceiving a Lack of Social Justice: Lower Class Individuals Apply Higher Moral Standards to Others

Other-serving double standards: People show moral hypercrisy in close relationships

Legitimacy and Deeply Embedded Core Normative Values in Different Social Groups

Threaten and affirm: The role of ingroup moral exemplars for promoting prosocial intergroup behavior through affirming moral identity

Moving Morality Beyond the In-Group: Liberals and Conservatives Show Differences on Group-Framed Moral Foundations and These Differences Mediate the Relationships to Perceived Bias and Threat

Spoils division rules shape aggression between natural groups

Self-Perceptions of Fairness in Individual and Group Contexts

Preferences for group dominance track and mediate the effects of macro-level social inequality and violence across societies

“In-Group Love” and “Out-Group Hate” as Motives for Individual Participation in Intergroup Conflict

Feeling Entitled to More

Punishing the privileged: Selfish offers from high-status allocators elicit greater punishment from third-party arbitrators

Outrage towards whom? Threats to moral group status impede striving to improve via outgroup-directed outrage.

Altruistic punishment in intergroup context

People Make the Same Bayesian Judgment They Criticize in Others

Do Higher-Class Individuals Feel More Entitled? the Role of System-Justifying Belief.

Victim Sensitivity and Proposal Size Modulate the Ingroup Favoritism During Fairness Norm Enforcement

Altruistic behavior in cohesive social groups: The role of target identifiability