Abstract:Danni Yang, Xianyou He Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Xianyou He, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, No. 55, West of Zhongshan Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510631, People's Republic of China, Email Purpose: This study examines the impact of prioritizing the out-group in intergroup moral dilemmas. The research aims to achieve three primary objectives: 1) investigating the relationship between out-group prioritization and perceptions of hypocrisy, 2) exploring the influence of perceived hypocrisy and negative emotions on moral judgments, and 3) uncovering the underlying reasons for perceiving outgroup prioritization as hypocritical. Methods: Experiments 1, 2 and 3 involved presenting Chinese participants with out-group rescuers and in-group rescuers and asking them to rate the two on three dimensions: level of hypocrisy, level of morality, and negative emotions toward the rescuers. In Experiment 3, the degree of similarity between participants and rescuers was manipulated to control for the level at which participants projected their own intrinsic motivations (ie, self-interest) onto the rescuers. Results: Experiments 1 and 2 jointly showed that participants perceived the out-group rescuer as more hypocritical and immoral compared to the in-group rescuer, and that participants had stronger negative emotions toward the out-group rescuer. Mediation analysis also demonstrated that the perception of hypocrisy and negative emotions largely mediated the relationship between the different rescuers and participants' evaluation of the rescuers' morality. In Experiment 3, participants gave higher hypocrisy ratings to high projection out-group rescuers compared to low projection out-group rescuers. Conclusion: In intergroup dilemmas, choosing to sacrifice the in-group to rescue the outgroup is perceived as more hypocritical, immoral, and objectionable. Perceived hypocrisy arises from an incongruity between individuals' subjective judgments of the rescuers' self-interest motives and the altruistic choice made by the rescuers to rescue the out-group. Keywords: intergroup moral dilemmas, hypocrisy perception, negative emotions McManus, Kleiman-Weiner, Young 1 have discussed the renowned altruist Peter Singer, whose philosophical stance argues for equal valuation of both our loved ones and strangers from afar. Singer's commitment to his beliefs is demonstrated by his practice of donating 40% of his income to highly effective charities benefiting strangers. However, when faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, Singer deviated from his philosophy and allocated more resources to care for her than his moral argument would permit. Interestingly, Singer did not face criticism for this disparity, prompting our inquiry into the potential consequences had he adhered strictly to his philosophical principles. Previous studies have explored the subsequent effects of the behavior of "sacrificing the in-group to save the out-group". However, current research in this area remains limited, with only preliminary explorations in terms of social acceptability and the impulse to punish. McManus, Kleiman-Weiner, and Young (2020) conducted a study that found helping socially out-group individuals at the expense of helping close individuals was considered morally unacceptable Law, Campbell, Gaesser 2 conducted a study that yielded similar results, indicating that individuals who prioritized the rescue of strangers over their own relatives were perceived as failing to uphold their familial obligations and consequently faced condemnation. However, a persistent question in the realm of research remains unanswered: why is the act of prioritizing assistance towards an external group in an intergroup dilemma considered morally unacceptable or even condemned, despite its highly altruistic nature? We acknowledge that there are numerous intricate factors at play, such as individuals' failure to fulfill their responsibilities towards their own in-group when prioritizing assistance to an out-group. 2 In our previous investigations into people's general moral preferences in intergroup moral dilemmas, we found it fascinating that individuals, when asked about their preference for rescuing in-groups over out-groups, often cited the prioritization of strangers over their own relatives as an act of "hypocrisy". This intriguing finding sparked our interest in exploring the concept of hypocrisy as an accurate descriptor for the perception of individuals who sacrifice the out-group at the expense of the in-group in intergroup dilemmas, whom we refer to as "out-group rescuers". In this article, our objective is to test -Abstract Truncated-

Other-serving double standards: People show moral hypercrisy in close relationships

Money, Moral Transgressions, and Blame

Moral Positive Illusion: Self–other Valuation Difference in Moral Foundation Theory

Hypocrisy moderates self-interest bias in moral character judgments

Communal Narcissism: Social Decisions and Neurophysiological Reactions

Being good to look good: Self‐reported moral character predicts moral double standards among reputation‐seeking individuals

Unveiling the Paradox of Selflessness: Exploring Perceptions of Hypocrisy and Priority Outgroup in Intergroup Moral Dilemmas

Perceiving a Lack of Social Justice: Lower Class Individuals Apply Higher Moral Standards to Others

Taking the moral high ground: Deontological and absolutist moral dilemma judgments convey self-righteousness

The Effects of Synchrony on Group Moral Hypocrisy

Effects of the Presence and Behavior of In-Group and Out-Group Strangers on Moral Hypocrisy

To Praise or to Blame? Neural Signals Predict Divergent Responses to Moral Hypocrisy

Culture, Status, and Hypocrisy: High-Status People Who Don’t Practice What They Preach Are Viewed as Worse in the United States Than China

Status cues and moral judgment: Formal attire induces moral favoritism but not for hypocrites

Everyone should get the same, but we should get more: Group entitlement and intergroup moral double standard

Unmasking Moral Hypocrisy: How Preschoolers Perceive and Judge Moral Hypocrites

Feeling better about doing worse: Social comparisons within romantic relationships.

Interdependent versus independent inconsistency: Cultural differences in how East Asian and Western people attribute hypocrisy.

To thine own self be true? Clarifying the effects of identity discrepancies on psychological distress and emotions

Self–other moral bias: Evidence from implicit measures and the Word-Embedding Association Test

Who Is Your Biggest Critic? Cultural Variation in Moral Judgments of the Self and Others