Abstract:Under resource distribution context, individuals have a strong aversion to unfair treatment not only toward themselves but also toward others. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the commonality and distinction between these two types of unfairness. Moreover, many neuroimaging studies have investigated how people evaluate and respond to unfairness in the abovementioned two contexts, but the consistency of the results remains to be investigated. To resolve these two issues, we sought to summarize existing findings regarding unfairness to self and others and to further elucidate the neural underpinnings related to distinguishing evaluation and response processes through meta-analyses of previous neuroimaging studies. Our results indicated that both types of unfairness consistently activate the affective and conflict-related anterior insula (AI) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/supplementary motor area (dACC/SMA), but the activations related to unfairness to self appeared stronger than those related to others, suggesting that individuals had negative reactions to both unfairness and a greater aversive response toward unfairness to self. During the evaluation process, unfairness to self activated the bilateral AI, dACC, and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), regions associated with unfairness aversion, conflict, and cognitive control, indicating reactive, emotional and automatic responses. In contrast, unfairness to others activated areas associated with theory of mind, the inferior parietal lobule and temporoparietal junction (IPL-TPJ), suggesting that making rational judgments from the perspective of others was needed. During the response, unfairness to self activated the affective-related left AI and striatum, whereas unfairness to others activated cognitive control areas, the left DLPFC and the thalamus. This indicated that the former maintained the traits of automaticity and emotionality, whereas the latter necessitated cognitive control. These findings provide a fine-grained description of the common and distinct neurocognitive mechanisms underlying unfairness to self and unfairness to others. Overall, this study not only validates the inequity aversion model but also provides direct evidence of neural mechanisms for neurobiological models of fairness.

Self–other moral bias: Evidence from implicit measures and the Word-Embedding Association Test

Moral Positive Illusion: Self–other Valuation Difference in Moral Foundation Theory

Moral Chameleons: The positive association between materialism and self-interest-triggered moral flexibility

Unveiling Unexpected Selfless Collectivism: Exploring Variances in Moral Beliefs Across Cultural Values

Identifying the Shared and Dissociable Neural Bases between Self-Worth and Moral Ambivalence

Immune to Situation: The Self-Serving Bias in Unambiguous Contexts.

Further Support for the Motivational Explanation of Self-Other Similarity Judgment Asymmetry

Unethical prosocial behaviour and self‐dehumanization: The roles of social connectedness and perceived morality

The self-bias in working memory: the favorability of self-referential stimuli in resource allocation

The effects of self-deception and egoistic-altruistic motivations on deceptive behavior

Personal Values and Cognitive Biases

The Dynamic Differences Between Self- and Other-Oriented Mental Inferences: an ERP Study on a False-Belief Task

Brain responses to self- and other- unfairness under resource distribution context: Meta-analysis of fMRI studies

Being good to look good: Self‐reported moral character predicts moral double standards among reputation‐seeking individuals

Measuring Implicit Bias in Explicitly Unbiased Large Language Models

The Implicit Sociometer Effect and the Moderating Role of Relational Self-Construal.

Taking the moral high ground: Deontological and absolutist moral dilemma judgments convey self-righteousness

Cross-cultural Differences in Adult Theory of Mind Abilities: A Comparison of Native-English Speakers and Native-Chinese Speakers on the Self/Other Differentiation Task.

Interpretation bias for ambiguous scenarios among individuals with high and low levels of empathy

Actor or recipient role matters: Neural correlates of self‐serving bias

Implicit Morality Theories: Employees’ Beliefs About the Malleability of Moral Character Shape Their Workplace Behaviors