Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over Mn–Ce–Ox/TiO2: a comparison between catalyst preparation methods

Mengxi Chao,Dongsen Mao,Gehua Li,Gang Li,Jun Yu,Xiaoming Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-020-05268-1
2020-03-07
Abstract:Three Mn–Ce–O<sub>x</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> mixed oxides (MCT) were prepared by sol–gel (SG), citric acid complexing (CA), and co-precipitation (CP) methods and used as catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH<sub>3</sub> (NH<sub>3</sub>-SCR) at low temperatures (75–200 °C). The physicochemical properties of the prepared catalysts were investigated by N<sub>2</sub> adsorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), temperature-programmed reduction by H<sub>2</sub> (H<sub>2</sub>-TPR), adsorption of NH<sub>3</sub> and NO followed by temperature-programmed desorption (NH<sub>3</sub>/NO-TPD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and in situ diffuse-reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectroscopy. The results show that both the low-temperature de-NO<sub>x</sub> activity and the resistance to SO<sub>2</sub> poisoning of the Mn–Ce–O<sub>x</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> catalyst decrease in the order of MCT-CP &gt; MCT-SG &gt; MCT-CA. These disparities can be mainly attributed to the difference in specific surface area, fractions of Mn<sup>4+</sup> (Mn<sup>4+</sup>/(Mn<sup>2+</sup>+Mn<sup>3+</sup>+Mn<sup>4+</sup>)) and surface adsorbed oxygen (surface adsorbed oxygen/(surface adsorbed oxygen + lattice oxygen)) species, and the adsorption capacity for NH<sub>3</sub> and NO of the different catalysts.
materials science, ceramics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?