Abstract:This paper contributes to the debate on the development of the future common European Union Policy on Asylum and Immigration. It seeks to explain the rationale behind the evolution of the Union's policy outlook on asylum and immigration. It then analyses the most recent Union‐wide policy tools available to address asylum and migration issues, arguing that common European asylum policies thus far have focused on containment of migration flows seen as a threat to the European internal security regime and in response to perceived populist pressures. The return and readmission clauses now being implemented, in agreements with countries outside of the Union, serve to illustrate this point, as does the political willingness to extra‐territorialize asylum processing. However, the focus on eliminating the root causes of migration flows is a relatively new paradigm, developed since the 1999 Tampere European Council. Although off to a slow start, the European Union Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument may become an institutional outlet to create a more normative framework for asylum and migration. The success of such a framework is contingent upon breaking with earlier conceptualizations of “asylum” as a security threat. Implicit in such a framework is the need to retain a clear distinction between asylum‐ and labour‐related migration. Partnerships must also be granted a budget sufficient for their establishment in real terms with countries of origin and transit. Lastly, there must be changes in modes of governance, as well as institutional reform, if efforts to elaborate a strategy on asylum and migration are to be executed successfully. Curiously, while the proposed Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe sought to abolish the pillar structure put in place by the 1992 Treaty of Maastricht, it would have retained the institutional inhibitions imposed by long‐existing tensions between national and community administrations and the “inter‐pillar” battles between the foreign policy, humanitarian and development dimensions of the EU apparatus. The current political debate about moving Europe “closer to its people”, following the rejection of the proposed Constitution at national referenda in France and the Netherlands, appears unlikely to solve any of these tensions.

Provisions Common to the Right of Residence and the Right of Permanent Residence

Right of Residence

European case law on migrants’ social and mobility rights: The need for a comparative approach in assessing ‘human rights overreach’

‘Everything went according to the rules’. Female citizen sponsors’ legal consciousness, intimate citizenship and family migration law

The EU Asylum, Immigration and Border Control Regimes: Including and Excluding: The “Deserving Migrant”

Retrieving the ‘subject’ of European integration

Proprietary right of residence

Chapter 2 Specific Provisions on the Common and Foreign Security Policy

The European Union's Citizenship Regime. Creating Norms and Building Practices

Unaccompanied Migrant Minors at the Frontier of Human Rights. The Spanish Case

Common policies of the European Union

Considerations regarding the Legal Aspects and Social Policy Issues related to Migration Phenomenon in the EU: The Case of Romania

Buy me love: entanglements of citizenship, income and emotions in regulating marriage migration

Article 22 TEU

Protection of Unaccompanied Migrant Minors in Two European Union Countries: (Re)Acting) or Being (In)Different?

The European Union оrganizational and legal mechanism for ensuring gender equality

European Union Policy on Asylum and Immigration. Addressing the Root Causes of Forced Migration: A Justice and Home Affairs Policy of Freedom, Security and Justice?

A timeline of freedom of movement in the European Economic Area

Part I State Obligations and Rights Protected, Ch.II Civil and Political Rights, Art.24: Right to Equal Protection

26. AFSJ: EU Criminal Law