Abstract:Publics across Europe increasingly feel that the European Union (EU) undermines the problem-solving capacities of its member states – particularly in social, welfare, migration, and labour policy – and increases inequality both within and across them. As a result, the EU in general, and specific institutions within it, strike many as standing in need of significant reform. This raises various questions: Which areas of EU policymaking and which specific institutions need to be reformed? What standard of assessment should guide us in formulating alternatives? More abstractly, what principles of socio-economic justice and solidarity, if any, apply at the EU level and how can these principles inform policies and institutional design proposals? Over the years, much has been written on the democratic deficit of the EU. But much less has been written on substantive (as opposed to procedural) normative standards. Even fewer authors have sought to bring together substantive moral analysis with concrete, empirically grounded policy suggestions. The goal of this Special Issue is to remedy both the lack of theorizing of justice and fairness in relation to the EU, and to make some headway in bridging the gap between normative, philosophical perspectives, and empirical analysis. To this end, the issue puts into dialogue political theorists and philosophers with more empirically minded researchers working in political science, sociology, and political economy to critically and constructively analyse the EU's major institutions.

Retrieving the ‘subject’ of European integration

ECJ Judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence

The European Union's Citizenship Regime. Creating Norms and Building Practices

Regulation Theory and the Political Economy of the European Union

Transnationalism vs. Nationalism: The Case of the Right to Free Movement

THEORIZING THE EUROPEAN UNION: International Organization, Domestic Polity, or Experiment in New Governance?

What do citizens want? And why does it matter? Discourses among citizens as opportunities and constraints for EU enlargement

Normative transformations in the European Union: on hardening and softening law

Transnational constitutionalism – conflicts‐law constitutionalism – economic constitutionalism: the exemplary case of the European Union

European case law on migrants’ social and mobility rights: The need for a comparative approach in assessing ‘human rights overreach’

Enacting the border multiple in the post-welfare state: Registration of foreign-born persons in Finland

Institutionalizing Intersectionality in Europe

Grand theories of European integration revisited: does identity politics shape the course of European integration?

The Governance Approach to European Integration

Reinforcing Institutional Power: The Discourse of Normalcy in European Union Governance

Concentric circles of flexible ‘EUropean’ integration: A typology of EU external governance relations

Global Inequality and the EU International Law Position on Cross-Border Data Flows

From the euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics

ONE STEP FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK? INTERPRETING ‘PARTICULAR SOCIAL GROUP’ IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

The Polysemy Of Anti-Discrimination Law: The Interpretation Architecture Of The Framework Employment Directive At The Court Of Justice

Introduction to the special issue: Justice and solidarity in Europe