Abstract:The stability and effectiveness of supranational organizations, like the European Union (EU), will improve when citizens perceive them as legitimate. Across three studies, two of which were preregistered, and a preregistered pilot study, we combined EU legal expertise with social psychological theory on morality to understand how perceived EU legitimacy is influenced by a sense of moral alignment with the EU. We propose that, currently, the EU gives more weight to values linked to "individualizing" moral foundations (e.g. compassion, social justice, and equality) than to values linked to "binding" moral foundations (e.g. patriotism, religion, and traditionalism). As this may leave people who endorse binding moral foundations feel unrepresented, we investigated whether the EU could gain legitimacy by appealing to values that resonate with binding moral foundations. In study 1, text analyses revealed that the European Commission President's State of the Union speeches indeed appeal more to individualizing than to binding moral foundations. Study 2 (n = 595) provided correlational evidence that the negative relationship between binding moral foundations and perceived EU legitimacy was mediated by lower moral alignment with EU law. Finally, study 3 (n = 567) showed through an experiment that reframing or rebalancing EU law to better align it with binding moral foundations could increase perceived EU legitimacy among people who endorse these moral foundations. The results illustrate the importance of understanding and attending to moral diversity among EU citizens. More generally, our work shows how a collaboration between social psychology and law contributes to safeguarding the legitimacy of supranational organizations.

Reinforcing Institutional Power: The Discourse of Normalcy in European Union Governance

Normalization and the discursive construction of “new” norms and “new” normality: discourse in the paradoxes of populism and neoliberalism

Political legitimacy and European monetary union: contracts, constitutionalism and the normative logic of two-level games

Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?

Normative transformations in the European Union: on hardening and softening law

Europe's new civilizing missions: the EU's normative power discourse

The Euro’s Taxing Path to Political Legitimacy

EU Responses to the Democratic Deficit and the Rule of Law Crisis: Is It Time for a (New) European Exceptionalism?

THEORIZING THE EUROPEAN UNION: International Organization, Domestic Polity, or Experiment in New Governance?

Undermining, defusing or defending European integration? Assessing public communication of European executives in times of EU politicisation

The politics of EU conditionality: the norm of minority protection during and beyond EU accession

Agenda‐setting under pressure: Does domestic politics influence the European Commission?

"Normative Power Europe" and EU's Diplomacy to China

Reconfiguring sovereignty: crisis, politicization, and European integration

Contesting procedural norms: the impact of politicisation on European foreign policy cooperation

The legitimation of the European Union in the news media: three treaty reform debates

The normative threat of subtle subversion: the return of ‘Eastern Europe’ as an ontological insecurity trope

Mapping the moral foundations of the European Union: Why a lack of moral diversity may undermine perceived EU legitimacy

Introduction to the special issue: Justice and solidarity in Europe

What do citizens want? And why does it matter? Discourses among citizens as opportunities and constraints for EU enlargement

The European Union's Citizenship Regime. Creating Norms and Building Practices