Abstract:The stability and effectiveness of supranational organizations, like the European Union (EU), will improve when citizens perceive them as legitimate. Across three studies, two of which were preregistered, and a preregistered pilot study, we combined EU legal expertise with social psychological theory on morality to understand how perceived EU legitimacy is influenced by a sense of moral alignment with the EU. We propose that, currently, the EU gives more weight to values linked to "individualizing" moral foundations (e.g. compassion, social justice, and equality) than to values linked to "binding" moral foundations (e.g. patriotism, religion, and traditionalism). As this may leave people who endorse binding moral foundations feel unrepresented, we investigated whether the EU could gain legitimacy by appealing to values that resonate with binding moral foundations. In study 1, text analyses revealed that the European Commission President's State of the Union speeches indeed appeal more to individualizing than to binding moral foundations. Study 2 (n = 595) provided correlational evidence that the negative relationship between binding moral foundations and perceived EU legitimacy was mediated by lower moral alignment with EU law. Finally, study 3 (n = 567) showed through an experiment that reframing or rebalancing EU law to better align it with binding moral foundations could increase perceived EU legitimacy among people who endorse these moral foundations. The results illustrate the importance of understanding and attending to moral diversity among EU citizens. More generally, our work shows how a collaboration between social psychology and law contributes to safeguarding the legitimacy of supranational organizations.

Europe's new civilizing missions: the EU's normative power discourse

"Normative Power Europe" and EU's Diplomacy to China

Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?

EU's Changing International Role:From Traditional State Power to Post-national Identity

Reinforcing Institutional Power: The Discourse of Normalcy in European Union Governance

Concentric circles of flexible ‘EUropean’ integration: A typology of EU external governance relations

External democracy promotion in times of internal rule-of-law crisis: the EU and its neighbourhood

The European Union's Citizenship Regime. Creating Norms and Building Practices

THEORIZING THE EUROPEAN UNION: International Organization, Domestic Polity, or Experiment in New Governance?

‘Not here for geopolitical interests or games’: the EU’s 2019 strategy and the regional and inter-regional competition for Central Asia

Europe in the Indo-Pacific: Economic, security, and normative engagement

Neocolonialism in Disguise? The European Commission’s Trade and Sustainable Development Discourse

European foreign policy since the Cold War: How ambitious, how inhibited?

Mapping the moral foundations of the European Union: Why a lack of moral diversity may undermine perceived EU legitimacy

GEOPOLITICAL TURN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE CONCEPTUAL REVOLUTION OR CONTINUATION OF THE TRADITION?

EU Responses to the Democratic Deficit and the Rule of Law Crisis: Is It Time for a (New) European Exceptionalism?

Normative transformations in the European Union: on hardening and softening law

Historical Institutionalism and the European Union’s post-Cold War Foreign Policy Development

Introduction to the special issue: Justice and solidarity in Europe

What do citizens want? And why does it matter? Discourses among citizens as opportunities and constraints for EU enlargement

The normative threat of subtle subversion: the return of ‘Eastern Europe’ as an ontological insecurity trope